Privy Council of the United Kingdom
The Privy Council of the United Kingdom is a formal body of advisers to the sovereign of the United Kingdom. Its membership mainly comprises senior politicians who are current or former members of either the House of Commons or the House of Lords.
|Abbreviation||Privy Council, PC|
|Formation||1 May 1708|
|Legal status||Advisory body|
|Members of the Privy Council|
|Privy Council Office|
|This article is part of a series on|
|Politics of the United Kingdom|
United Kingdom portal |
The Privy Council formally advises the sovereign on the exercise of the royal prerogative, and as a body corporate (as Queen-in-Council) it issues executive instruments known as Orders in Council, which among other powers enact Acts of Parliament. The Council also holds the delegated authority to issue Orders of Council, mostly used to regulate certain public institutions. The Council advises the sovereign on the issuing of Royal Charters, which are used to grant special status to incorporated bodies, and city or borough status to local authorities. Otherwise, the Privy Council's powers have now been largely replaced by its executive committee, the Cabinet of the United Kingdom.
Certain judicial functions are also performed by the Queen-in-Council, although in practice its actual work of hearing and deciding upon cases is carried out day-to-day by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. The Judicial Committee consists of senior judges appointed as privy counsellors: predominantly Justices of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and senior judges from the Commonwealth. The Privy Council formerly acted as the High Court of Appeal for the entire British Empire (other than for the United Kingdom itself). It continues to hear judicial appeals from some other independent Commonwealth countries, as well as Crown dependencies and British Overseas Territories.
The Privy Council of the United Kingdom was preceded by the Privy Council of Scotland and the Privy Council of England. The key events in the formation of the modern Privy Council are given below:
In Anglo-Saxon England, Witenagemot was an early equivalent to the Privy Council of England. During the reigns of the Norman monarchs, the English Crown was advised by a royal court or curia regis, which consisted of magnates, ecclesiastics and high officials. The body originally concerned itself with advising the sovereign on legislation, administration and justice. Later, different bodies assuming distinct functions evolved from the court. The courts of law took over the business of dispensing justice, while Parliament became the supreme legislature of the kingdom. Nevertheless, the Council retained the power to hear legal disputes, either in the first instance or on appeal. Furthermore, laws made by the sovereign on the advice of the Council, rather than on the advice of Parliament, were accepted as valid. Powerful sovereigns often used the body to circumvent the Courts and Parliament. For example, a committee of the Council—which later became the Court of the Star Chamber—was during the 15th century permitted to inflict any punishment except death, without being bound by normal court procedure. During Henry VIII's reign, the sovereign, on the advice of the Council, was allowed to enact laws by mere proclamation. The legislative pre-eminence of Parliament was not restored until after Henry VIII's death. The nineteen member council by 1540 had become a new national institution, likely, the creation of Thomas Cromwell without exact definitions of its powers. Though the royal Council retained legislative and judicial responsibilities, it became a primarily administrative body. The Council consisted of forty members in 1553, whereas Henry VII swore over a hundred servants to his council. Sovereigns relied on a smaller working committees, which evolved into the modern Cabinet.
By the end of the English Civil War, the monarchy, House of Lords, and Privy Council had been abolished. The remaining parliamentary chamber, the House of Commons, instituted a Council of State to execute laws and to direct administrative policy. The forty-one members of the Council were elected by the House of Commons; the body was headed by Oliver Cromwell, de facto military dictator of the nation. In 1653, however, Cromwell became Lord Protector, and the Council was reduced to between thirteen and twenty-one members, all elected by the Commons. In 1657, the Commons granted Cromwell even greater powers, some of which were reminiscent of those enjoyed by monarchs. The Council became known as the Protector's Privy Council; its members were appointed by the Lord Protector, subject to Parliament's approval.
In 1659, shortly before the restoration of the monarchy, the Protector's Council was abolished. Charles II restored the Royal Privy Council, but he, like previous Stuart monarchs, chose to rely on a small group of advisers. Under George I even more power transferred to this committee. It now began to meet in the absence of the sovereign, communicating its decisions to him after the fact.
Thus, the British Privy Council, as a whole, ceased to be a body of important confidential advisers to the sovereign; the role passed to a committee of the Council, now known as the Cabinet.
The sovereign, when acting on the Council's advice, is known as the King-in-Council or Queen-in-Council. The members of the Council are collectively known as The Lords of Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council (sometimes The Lords and others of ...). The chief officer of the body is the Lord President of the Council, who is the fourth-highest Great Officer of State, a Cabinet member and normally, either the Leader of the House of Lords or of the House of Commons. Another important official is the Clerk, whose signature is appended to all orders made in the Council.
Both Privy Counsellor and Privy Councillor may be correctly used to refer to a member of the Council. The former, however, is preferred by the Privy Council Office, emphasising English usage of the term Counsellor as "one who gives counsel", as opposed to "one who is a member of a council". A Privy Counsellor is traditionally said to be "sworn of" the Council after being received by the sovereign.
The sovereign may appoint anyone a Privy Counsellor, but in practice appointments are made only on the advice of Her Majesty's Government. The majority of appointees are senior politicians, including Ministers of the Crown, the few most senior figures of the Loyal Opposition, the Parliamentary leader of the third-largest party, a couple of the most senior figures in the devolved British governments and senior politicians from Commonwealth countries. Besides these, the Council includes a very few members of the Royal Family (usually the consort and heir apparent only), a few dozen judges from British and Commonwealth countries, a few clergy and a small number of senior civil servants.
There is no statutory limit to its membership. Members have no automatic right to attend all Privy Council meetings, and only some are summoned regularly to meetings (in practice at the Prime Minister's discretion).
The Church of England's three senior bishops – the archbishop of Canterbury, the archbishop of York and the bishop of London – become privy counsellors upon appointment. Senior members of the royal family may also be appointed, but this is confined to the monarch's spouse, heir apparent, and heir apparent's spouse. The private secretary to the sovereign is always appointed a privy counsellor, as are the Lord Chamberlain, the Speaker of the House of Commons, and the Lord Speaker. Justices of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, judges of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, senior judges of the Inner House of the Court of Session (Scotland's highest law court) and the Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland also join the Privy Council ex officio.
The balance of privy counsellors is largely made up of politicians. The Prime Minister, Cabinet ministers and the Leader of HM Opposition are traditionally sworn of the Privy Council upon appointment. Leaders of major parties in the House of Commons, First Ministers of the devolved assemblies, some senior Ministers outside Cabinet, and on occasion other respected senior parliamentarians are appointed privy counsellors.
Because privy counsellors are bound by oath to keep matters discussed at Council meetings secret, the appointment of the leaders of opposition parties as privy counsellors allows the Government to share confidential information with them "on Privy Council terms". This usually only happens in special circumstances, such as in matters of national security. For example, Tony Blair met Iain Duncan Smith (then Leader of HM Opposition) and Charles Kennedy (then Leader of the Liberal Democrats) "on Privy Council terms" to discuss the evidence for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
Although the Privy Council is primarily a British institution, officials from some other Commonwealth realms are also appointed. By 2000, the most notable instance was New Zealand, whose Prime Minister, senior politicians, Chief Justice and Court of Appeal Justices were traditionally appointed Privy Counsellors. However, appointments of New Zealand members have since been discontinued. The Prime Minister, the Speaker, the Governor-General and the Chief Justice of New Zealand are still accorded the style Right Honourable, but without membership of the Council. Until the late 20th century, the prime ministers and chief justices of Canada and Australia were also appointed privy counsellors. Canada also has its own Privy Council, the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (see below). Prime ministers of some other Commonwealth countries that retain the Queen as their sovereign continue to be sworn of the Council.
Privy Council oath and initiation rite
The oath of the king's council (later the Privy Council) was first formulated in the early thirteenth century. This oath went through a series of revisions, but the modern form of the oath was essentially settled in 1571. It was formerly regarded by the Privy Council as criminal, and possibly treasonous, to disclose the oath administered to privy counsellors as they take office. However, the oath was officially made public by the Blair Government in a written parliamentary answer in 1998, as follows. It had also been read out in full in the House of Lords during debate by Lord Rankeillour on 21 December 1932.
You do swear by Almighty God to be a true and faithful Servant unto the Queen's Majesty, as one of Her Majesty's Privy Council. You will not know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted, done, or spoken against Her Majesty's Person, Honour, Crown, or Dignity Royal, but you will let and withstand the same to the uttermost of your Power, and either cause it to be revealed to Her Majesty Herself, or to such of Her Privy Council as shall advertise Her Majesty of the same. You will, in all things to be moved, treated, and debated in Council, faithfully and truly declare your Mind and Opinion, according to your Heart and Conscience; and will keep secret all Matters committed and revealed unto you, or that shall be treated of secretly in Council. And if any of the said Treaties or Counsels shall touch any of the Counsellors, you will not reveal it unto him, but will keep the same until such time as, by the Consent of Her Majesty, or of the Council, Publication shall be made thereof. You will to your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance unto the Queen's Majesty; and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminences, and Authorities, granted to Her Majesty, and annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States, or Potentates. And generally in all things you will do as a faithful and true Servant ought to do to Her Majesty. So help you God.
Privy counsellors can choose to affirm their allegiance in similar terms, should they prefer not to take a religious oath. At the induction ceremony, the order of precedence places Anglicans (being those of the established church) before others.
The initiation ceremony for newly appointed privy counsellors is held in private, and typically requires kneeling on a stool before the sovereign and then kissing hands. According to The Royal Encyclopaedia: "The new privy counsellor or minister will extend his or her right hand, palm upwards, and, taking the Queen's hand lightly, will kiss it with no more than a touch of the lips." The ceremony has caused difficulties for privy counsellors who advocate republicanism; Tony Benn said in his diaries that he kissed his own thumb, rather than the Queen's hand, while Jeremy Corbyn reportedly did not kneel. Not all members of the privy council go through the initiation ceremony; appointments are frequently made by an Order in Council, although it is "rare for a party leader to use such a course."
Term of office
Membership is conferred for life. Formerly, the death of a monarch ("demise of the Crown") brought an immediate dissolution of the Council, as all Crown appointments automatically lapsed. By the 18th century, it was enacted that the Council would not be dissolved until up to six months after the demise of the Crown. By convention, however, the sovereign would reappoint all members of the Council after its dissolution. In practice, therefore, membership continued without a break. In 1901, the law was changed to ensure that Crown Appointments became wholly unaffected by any succession of monarch.
The sovereign, however, may remove an individual from the Privy Council. Former MP Elliot Morley was expelled on 8 June 2011, following his conviction on charges of false accounting in connection with the British parliamentary expenses scandal. Before this, the last individual to be expelled from the Council against his will was Sir Edgar Speyer, Bt., who was removed on 13 December 1921 for collaborating with the enemy German Empire, during the First World War.
Individuals can choose to resign, sometimes to avoid expulsion. Three members voluntarily left the Privy Council in the 20th century: John Profumo, who resigned on 26 June 1963; John Stonehouse, who resigned on 17 August 1976 and Jonathan Aitken, who resigned on 25 June 1997 following allegations of perjury.
So far, three privy counsellors have resigned in the 21st century, coincidentally all in the same year. On 4 February 2013, Chris Huhne announced that he would voluntarily leave the Privy Council after pleading guilty to perverting the course of justice. Lord Prescott stood down on 6 July 2013, in protest against delays in the introduction of press regulation, expecting others to follow. Denis MacShane resigned on 9 October 2013, before a High Court hearing at which he pleaded guilty of false accounting and was subsequently imprisoned.
Meetings of the Privy Council are normally held once each month wherever the sovereign may be in residence at the time. The quorum, according to the Privy Council Office, is three, though some statutes provide for other quorums (for example, section 35 of the Opticians Act 1989 provides for a lower quorum of two).
The sovereign attends the meeting, though their place may be taken by two or more counsellors of state. Under the Regency Acts 1937 to 1953, Counsellors of state may be chosen from among the sovereign's spouse and the four individuals next in the line of succession who are over 21 years of age (18 for the first in line). Customarily the sovereign remains standing at meetings of the Privy Council, so that no other members may sit down, thereby keeping meetings short. The lord president reads out a list of orders to be made, and the sovereign merely says "Approved".
Few privy counsellors are required to attend regularly. The settled practice is that day-to-day meetings of the Council are attended by four privy counsellors, usually the relevant minister to the matters pertaining. The Cabinet Minister holding the office of Lord President of the Council, currently Jacob Rees-Mogg , invariably presides. Under Britain's modern conventions of parliamentary government and constitutional monarchy, every order made in Council is drafted by a government department and has already been approved by the minister responsible – thus actions taken by the Queen-in-Council are formalities required for validation of each measure.
Full meetings of the Privy Council are held only when the reigning sovereign announces their own engagement (which last happened on 23 November 1839, in the reign of Queen Victoria); or when there is a demise of the Crown, either by the death or abdication of the monarch. A full meeting of the Privy Council was also held on 6 February 1811, when the Prince of Wales was sworn in as regent by Act of Parliament. The current statutes regulating the establishment of a regency in the case of minority or incapacity of the sovereign also require any regents to swear their oaths before the Privy Council.
In the case of a demise of the Crown, the Privy Council – together with the Lords Spiritual, the Lords Temporal, the lord mayor and aldermen of the City of London as well as representatives of Commonwealth realms – makes a proclamation declaring the accession of the new sovereign and receives an oath from the new monarch relating to the security of the Church of Scotland, as required by law. It is also customary for the new sovereign to make an allocution to the Privy Council on that occasion, and this Sovereign's Speech is formally published in The London Gazette. Any such Special Assembly of the Privy Council, convened to proclaim the accession of a new sovereign and witness the monarch's statutory oath, is known as an Accession Council. The last such meetings were held on 6 and 8 February 1952: as Elizabeth II was abroad when the last demise of the Crown took place, the Accession Council met twice, once to proclaim the sovereign (meeting of 6 February 1952), and then again after the new queen had returned to Britain, to receive from her the oath required by statute (meeting of 8 February 1952).
The sovereign exercises executive authority by making orders in council upon the advice of the Privy Council. Orders-in-council, which are drafted by the government rather than by the sovereign, are secondary legislation and are used to make government regulations and to make government appointments. Furthermore, orders-in-council are used to grant royal assent for Measures of the National Assembly for Wales, and laws passed by the legislatures of British Crown dependencies.
Distinct from orders-in-council are orders of council: the former are issued by the sovereign upon the advice of the Privy Council, whereas the latter are made by members of the Privy Council without requiring the sovereign's approval. They are issued under the specific authority of Acts of Parliament, and most commonly are used for the regulation of public institutions.
The sovereign also grants royal charters on the advice of the Privy Council. Charters bestow special status to incorporated bodies; they are used to grant "chartered" status to certain professional, educational or charitable bodies, and sometimes also city and borough status to towns. The Privy Council therefore deals with a wide range of matters, which also includes university and livery company statutes, churchyards, coinage and the dates of bank holidays. The Privy Council formerly had sole power to grant academic degree-awarding powers and the title of university, but following the Higher Education and Research Act 2017 these powers have been given to the Office for Students for educational institutions in England.
The Accession Council is made up of privy counsellors, great officers of state, members of the House of Lords, the lord mayor of the City of London, the aldermen of the City of London, high commissioners of Commonwealth realms, and senior civil servants. It is a ceremonial body which assembles in St James's Palace upon the death of a monarch, to make formal proclamation of the accession of the successor to the throne.
The Baronetage Committee was established by a 1910 order in council, during Edward VII's reign, to scrutinise all succession claims (and thus reject doubtful ones) to be placed on the Roll of Baronets.
Cabinet of the United Kingdom
The Cabinet of the United Kingdom is the collective decision-making body of Her Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom, composed of the prime minister and 21 cabinet ministers, the most senior of the government ministers.
Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey
The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey recommends approval of Channel Islands legislation.
Committee for the Purposes of the Crown Office Act 1877
The Committee for the purposes of the Crown Office Act 1877 consists of the Lord Chancellor and Lord Privy Seal as well as a secretary of state. The Committee, which last met in 1988, is concerned with the design and usage of wafer seals.
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council consists of senior judges who are Privy Counsellors. The decision of the Committee is presented in the form of "advice" to the monarch, but in practice it is always followed by the sovereign (as Crown-in-Council), who formally approves the recommendation of the Judicial Committee.
Within the United Kingdom, the Judicial Committee hears appeals from ecclesiastical courts, the Court of Admiralty of the Cinque Ports, prize courts and the Disciplinary Committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, appeals against schemes of the Church Commissioners and appeals under certain Acts of Parliament (e.g., the House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975). The Crown-in-Council was formerly the Supreme Appeal Court for the entire British Empire, but a number of Commonwealth countries have now abolished the right to such appeals. The Judicial Committee continues to hear appeals from several Commonwealth countries, from British Overseas Territories, Sovereign Base Areas and Crown dependencies. The Judicial Committee had direct jurisdiction in cases relating to the Scotland Act 1998, the Government of Wales Act 1998 and the Northern Ireland Act 1998, but this was transferred to the new Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in 2009.
The Lords Commissioners are Privy Counsellors appointed by the Monarch of the United Kingdom to exercise, on their behalf, certain functions relating to Parliament which would otherwise require the Monarch's attendance at the Palace of Westminster. These include the opening and prorogation of Parliament, the confirmation of a newly elected Speaker of the House of Commons and the granting of Royal Assent. In current practice, the Lords Commissioners usually include the Lord Chancellor, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the leaders of the three major parties in the House of Lords, the Convener of the House of Lords Crossbenchers, and the Lord Speaker.
Scottish Universities Committee
In addition to the Standing Committees, ad hoc Committees are notionally set up to consider and report on petitions for royal charters of Incorporation and to approve changes to the bye-laws of bodies created by royal charter.
Committees of privy counsellors are occasionally established to examine specific issues. Such committees are independent of the Privy Council Office and therefore do not report directly to the lord president of the council. Examples of such committees include:
- the Butler Committee – operation of the intelligence services in the runup to military intervention in Iraq
- the Chilcot Committee – for the Chilcot Inquiry on the use of intercept materials
- the Gibson Committee of enquiry set up in 2010 – to consider whether the UK security services were complicit in torture of detainees.
The Civil Service is formally governed by Privy Council Orders, as an exercise of the Royal Prerogative. One such order implemented HM Government's ban of GCHQ staff from joining a trade union. Another, the Civil Service (Amendment) Order in Council 1997, permitted the Prime Minister to grant up to three political advisers management authority over some Civil Servants.
In the 1960s, the Privy Council made an order to evict the 2,000 inhabitants of the 65-island Chagos Archipelago in the Indian Ocean, in preparation for the establishment of a joint United States–United Kingdom military base on the largest outlying island, Diego Garcia, some 60 miles (97 km) distant. In 2000 the Court of Appeal ruled the 1971 Immigration Ordinance preventing resettlement unlawful. In 2004, the Privy Council, under Jack Straw's tenure, overturned the ruling. In 2006 the High Court of Justice found the Privy Council's decision to be unlawful. Sir Sydney Kentridge described the treatment of the Chagossians as "outrageous, unlawful and a breach of accepted moral standards": Justice Kentridge stated that there was no known precedent "for the lawful use of prerogative powers to remove or exclude an entire population of British subjects from their homes and place of birth", and the Court of Appeal were persuaded by this argument, but the Law Lords (at that time the UK's highest law court) found its decision to be flawed and overturned the ruling by a 3–2 decision thereby upholding the terms of the Ordinance.
Rights and privileges of members
The Privy Council as a whole is termed "The Most Honourable" whilst its members individually, the Privy Counsellors, are entitled to be styled "The Right Honourable".
Each Privy Counsellor has the right of personal access to the sovereign. Peers were considered to enjoy this right individually; members of the House of Commons possess the right collectively. In each case, personal access may only be used to tender advice on public affairs.
Only Privy Counsellors can signify Royal Consent to the examination of a Bill affecting the rights of the Crown.
Members of the Privy Council are privileged to be given advance notice of any prime ministerial decision to commit HM Armed Forces in enemy action.
Privy Counsellors have the right to sit on the steps of the Sovereign's Throne in the Chamber of the House of Lords during debates, a privilege which was shared with heirs apparent of those hereditary peers who were to become members of the House of Lords before Labour's partial Reform of the Lords in 1999, diocesan bishops of the Church of England yet to be Lords Spiritual, retired bishops who formerly sat in the House of Lords, the Dean of Westminster, Peers of Ireland, the Clerk of the Crown in Chancery, and the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod. While Privy Counsellors have the right to sit on the steps of the Sovereign's Throne they do so only as observers and are not allowed to participate in any of the workings of the House of Lords. Nowadays this privilege is rarely exercised. A notable recent instance of the exercising of this privilege was used by the Prime Minister, Theresa May, and David Lidington, who watched the opening of the debate of the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill 2017 in the House of Lords.
Privy Counsellors are accorded a formal rank of precedence, if not already having a higher one. At the beginning of each new Parliament, and at the discretion of the Speaker, those members of the House of Commons who are Privy Counsellors usually take the oath of allegiance before all other members except the Speaker and the Father of the House (who is the member of the House who has the longest continuous service). Should a Privy Counsellor rise to speak in the House of Commons at the same time as another Honourable Member, the Speaker usually gives priority to the "Right Honourable" Member. This parliamentary custom, however, was discouraged under New Labour after 1998, despite the Government’s not being supposed to exert influence over the Speaker.
All those sworn of the Privy Council are accorded the style "The Right Honourable", but some nobles automatically have higher styles: non-royal dukes are styled "The Most Noble" and marquesses, "The Most Honourable". Modern custom as recommended by Debrett's is to use the post-nominal letters "PC" in a social style of address for peers who are Privy Counsellors. For commoners, "The Right Honourable" is sufficient identification of their status as a Privy Counsellor and they do not use the post-nominal letters "PC". The Ministry of Justice revises current practice of this convention from time to time.
The Privy Council is one of the four principal councils of the sovereign. The other three are the courts of law, the Commune Concilium (Common Council, i.e. Parliament) and the Magnum Concilium (Great Council, i.e. the assembly of all the peers of the realm). All are still in existence, or at least have never been formally abolished, but the Magnum Concilium has not been summoned since 1640 and was considered defunct even then.
Several other Privy Councils have advised the sovereign. England and Scotland once had separate Privy Councils (the Privy Council of England and Privy Council of Scotland). The Acts of Union 1707 united the two countries into the Kingdom of Great Britain and in 1708 the Parliament of Great Britain abolished the Privy Council of Scotland. Thereafter there was one Privy Council of Great Britain sitting in London. Ireland, on the other hand, continued to have a separate Privy Council even after the Act of Union 1800. The Privy Council of Ireland was abolished in 1922, when the greater part of Ireland separated from the United Kingdom; it was succeeded by the Privy Council of Northern Ireland, which became dormant after the suspension of the Parliament of Northern Ireland in 1972. No further appointments have been made since then, and only three appointees were still living as of November 2017.
Canada has had its own Privy Council—the Queen's Privy Council for Canada—since 1867. While the Canadian Privy Council is specifically "for Canada", the Privy Council discussed above is not "for the United Kingdom"; to clarify the ambiguity where necessary, the latter was traditionally referred to as the Imperial Privy Council. Equivalent organs of state in other Commonwealth realms, such as Australia and New Zealand, are called Executive Councils.
- List of Royal members of the Privy Council
- List of current Privy Counsellors
- List of longest-serving current Privy Counsellors
- List of senior members of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom
- List of Privy Council Orders
- Committee of the Privy Council for Trade and Foreign Plantations
- Clerk to the Privy Council
- Court uniform and dress in the United Kingdom
- Historic list of Privy Counsellors
- Burke's Peerage & Baronetage
- Officially Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council or known simply as the Privy Council
- Dicey, pp. 6–7.
- Dicey, p. 24.
- Dicey, pp. 12–14.
- Gay, p. 2.
- Maitland, pp. 262–3.
- Maitland, p. 253.
- Wilson, Derek. (1973). A Tudor tapestry : Men, women and society in Reformation England. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press. ISBN 0-8229-3242-3. p. 130 , footnote no. 12 pp. 256–257. Cf. Elton, G.R. The Tudor Revolution in Government: Administrative changes in the reign of Henry VIII. pp. 316 ff. The Internet Archive website Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- Goodnow, p. 123
- Maitland, p. 256.
- Elton, G.R. (1953). The Tudor revolution in government; administrative changes in the reign of Henry VIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 318. ISBN 0521048923. The Internet Archive website. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
- Plant, D (2007). "The Council of State". British Civil Wars, Commonwealth and Protectorate, 1638–60. Archived from the original on 26 September 2008. Retrieved 11 September 2008.
- Warshaw, p. 7.
- Gay and Rees, pp. 2–3.
- "Legislative Competence Orders" (PDF). Constitutional Quick Guides No. 3. Welsh Assembly. 2007. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 October 2008. Retrieved 12 September 2008.
- e.g. "Statutory Instrument 1988 No. 1162". Office of Public Sector Information. Archived from the original on 8 August 2008. Retrieved 11 September 2008.
- e.g. "Statutory Instrument 1999 No. 1379". Office of Public Sector Information. Archived from the original on 9 August 2008. Retrieved 11 September 2008.
- H. Cox, p. 388.
- "Departmental Plan 2004/05" (PDF). Privy Council Office. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 October 2008. Retrieved 11 September 2008.
- Brazier, p. 199, note 109.
- "Privy Council Office FAQs". Privy Council Office. Archived from the original on 5 April 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
- "No. 56070". The London Gazette (Supplement). 30 December 2000. p. 1.
- Blackstone, I. 174.
- Gay, p. 3.
- "Bishop of London". Diocese of London. Archived from the original on 9 May 2008. Retrieved 15 August 2008.
- "Mailbox January 2007". Royal Insight. Royal Household. Archived from the original on 27 January 2009. Retrieved 11 September 2008.
- Peel, Michael; Croft, Jabe (20 September 2009). "Privy Council hampers Supreme Court". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 19 February 2011. Retrieved 5 October 2009.
- "English Judges and the Bar: Court of Appeal and High Court". Forms of address. Ministry of Justice. 2008. Archived from the original on 6 March 2007. Retrieved 15 August 2008.
- "Scottish Judges and the Bar". Forms of address. Ministry of Justice. 2008. Archived from the original on 6 March 2007. Retrieved 15 August 2008.
- "Northern Ireland Judges and the Bar". Forms of address. Ministry of Justice. 2008. Archived from the original on 6 March 2007. Retrieved 15 August 2008.
- "Morgan made Privy Counsellor". BBC. 24 July 2000. Archived from the original on 30 August 2007. Retrieved 12 September 2008.
- "So what is the Privy Council?". BBC. 18 February 2003. Archived from the original on 26 July 2008. Retrieved 12 September 2008.
- "The title 'The Honourable' and the Privy Council". New Zealand Honours. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Archived from the original on 3 July 2008. Retrieved 3 August 2008.
- "DPMC—New Zealand Honours: The Right Honourable". New Zealand Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. 2010. Archived from the original on 13 May 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2011.
- "Order Paper and Notice Paper, 20 October 2000". Senate of Canada. 2000. Archived from the original on 25 September 2007. Retrieved 12 September 2008.
- "Commonwealth Judges". Forms of address. Ministry of Justice. 2008. Archived from the original on 29 August 2008. Retrieved 12 September 2008.
- Jonathan McGovern, ‘The Development of the Privy Council Oath in Tudor England’, Historical Research 93, no. 260 (2020), 273–285
- Hattersley, Roy (14 December 2000). "Let's abolish this absurdity". The Guardian. Guardian News and Media. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013. Retrieved 24 April 2010.
Quoting those words from the Privy Council's oath is certainly an offence and possibly treason.
- "HC Hansard Vol 317 Col 182". Hansard. London: Parliament of the United Kingdom. 28 July 1998. Archived from the original on 15 October 2010. Retrieved 31 August 2010.
- "HL Deb Vol 86 cc520-35". Hansard. London: Parliament of the United Kingdom. 21 December 1932. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 17 December 2015.
- "Privy Counsellors – Glossary page". UK Parliament. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2019.
- Chris Cook (18 September 2015). "How civil servants kept the Privy Council's secrets". BBC. Archived from the original on 19 September 2015. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- Privy Council: Guide to its origins, powers and members Archived 2 April 2018 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News (8 October 2015).
- Privy council: Jeremy Corbyn did not kneel for the Queen Archived 23 August 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Guardian (11 November 2015).
- Wintour, Patrick (8 October 2015). "Jeremy Corbyn rejects formal privy council induction by Queen". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 11 October 2016. Retrieved 12 October 2016.
- Blackstone, I. 176.
- The most recent enactment deferring dissolution was the Succession to the Crown Act 1707 (6 Ann. c. 41).Browning, Andrew (1996). English Historical Documents, 1660–1714. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-14371-4. Text of the Succession to the Crown Act 1707 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk. . Section VIII provided, "... the Privy Council of Her Majesty, her heirs or successors for the Kingdom of Great Britain, shall not be determined or dissolved by the death or demise of Her Majesty, her heirs or successors; but such Privy Council shall continue and act as such by the space of six months next after such demise, unless sooner determined by the next successor to whom the imperial Crown of this realm is limited and appointed to go, remain, and descend; ..." Despite becoming obsolete in 1901, this section remained on the statute book until it was repealed by the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1973 (c. 39), section 1(1) and Schedule 1 part I.
- H. Cox, p. 389.
- See, for example, the proclamation following the accession of Queen Victoria on the death of William IV: "By the Queen: A Proclamation: Requiring all Persons, being in Office of Authority or Government at the Decease of the late King, to proceed in the Execution of their respective Offices". The London Gazette. London: Francis Watts (19514): 1625–1626. 27 June 1837. Archived from the original on 3 September 2011. Retrieved 7 June 2010.
- The Demise of the Crown Act 1901 (1 Edw. 7 c. 5), "An Act to amend the Law relating to the Holding of Offices in case of the Demise of the Crown" Archived 8 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine (original text), Text of the Demise of the Crown Act 1901 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk. . Section 1(1) provides, "The holding of any office under the Crown, whether within or without His Majesty's dominions, shall not be affected, nor shall any fresh appointment thereto be rendered necessary, by the demise of the Crown." The act came into force within six months of the death of Victoria and section 1(2) ensured that no offices were vacated on the subsequent accession of Edward VII. See also commentary in Appendix 2 of the report that preceded the 1973 Act: Law Commission, Scottish Law Commission (1972). Statute Law Revision: Fourth Report. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office. pp. 30–55. ISBN 0-10-151080-2. Retrieved 7 June 2010. (LC 49, SLC 26, Cmnd 5108).
- "Morley's Privy Council expulsion". The Independent. 9 June 2011.
- "No. 59820". The London Gazette. 14 June 2011. p. 11257.
- Rayment, Leigh (1 April 2008). "Privy Counsellors 1836–1914". Archived from the original on 26 September 2008. Retrieved 17 September 2008.
Sir Edgar Speyer (struck off 13 Dec 1921)
- "No. 32547". The London Gazette. 12 December 1921. p. 10123.
- "Queen Accepts Aitken's Resignation". BBC. 1997. Archived from the original on 24 November 2004. Retrieved 12 February 2008.
The Queen has accepted Jonathan Aitken's resignation from the Privy Council. [...] Two former disgraced Ministers, John Profumo and John Stonehouse, have also resigned from the Council, but no one has been thrown off since 1921 when Sir Edgar Speyer was struck off for collaborating with the Germans in the First World War.
- Rayment, Leigh (2 April 2008). "Privy Counsellors 1915–1968". Archived from the original on 26 September 2008. Retrieved 17 September 2008.
John Dennis Profumo (resigned 26 Jun 1963) [...] John Thomson Stonehouse (resigned 17 Aug 1976)
- "No. 43041". The London Gazette. 28 June 1963. p. 5533.
- "No. 46994". The London Gazette. 19 August 1976. p. 11347.
- Rayment, Leigh (10 September 2008). "Privy Counsellors 1969–present". Archived from the original on 7 June 2008. Retrieved 17 September 2008.
Jonathan William Patrick Aitken (resigned 25 June 1997)
- "No. 54817". The London Gazette. 26 July 1997. p. 4381.
- "Huhne admits speeding points lie". 4 February 2013. Archived from the original on 27 April 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2019 – via bbc.co.uk.
- "Prescott resigns from Privy Council". 6 July 2013. Archived from the original on 9 April 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2019 – via bbc.co.uk.
- "London Gazette No 60653". Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 20 October 2013.
- "Queen and Privy Council". Monarchy Today. Royal Household. Archived from the original on 24 June 2008. Retrieved 3 August 2008.
- "Privy Council website". Archived from the original on 21 December 2011. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
- "Section 35, Opticians Act 1989". Government of the United Kingdom. Archived from the original on 7 May 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
- Gay and Rees, p. 4.
- "Counsellors of State". Monarchy Today. Royal Household. Archived from the original on 19 September 2008. Retrieved 3 August 2008.
- "No. 48172". The London Gazette. 29 April 1980. p. 6361.
- Brazier, p. 199.
- "Lord President of the Council". Government of the United Kingdom. Archived from the original on 24 July 2019. Retrieved 25 July 2019.
- "Roles and Responsibilities of the Lord President". Privy Council Office. Archived from the original on 5 April 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
- The Times, 25 November 1839, p. 5.
- "Gazette of 7 February 1811". The London Gazette. Archived from the original on 7 May 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
- Regency Act 1937, Sect. 2.2 and 4.1.
- The Times, 7 February 1952, p. 6; The Times, 8 February 1952, p. 6.
- Participation, Expert. "Government of Wales Act 2006". Government of the United Kingdom. Archived from the original on 11 April 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2019.
- Order in Council Archived 19 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine dated 9 July 2008, approving The NHS Redress (Wales) Measure 2008, the first Measure to be passed by the Assembly on 6 May 2008. Office of Public Sector Information.
- House of Commons Information Office (May 2008). "Statutory Instruments" (PDF). Factsheet. ISSN 0144-4689. No.L7 Ed 3.9. Retrieved 3 August 2008.
- "Royal Charter". Privy Council Office. Archived from the original on 5 April 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
- Gay and Rees, p. 5.
- H. Cox, p. 393.
- "Degree awarding powers and university title". QAA. Archived from the original on 10 August 2014. Retrieved 16 October 2017.
- Higher Education and Research Act 2017 (2017 c. 29 ss. 42–60). Text of the Higher Education and Research Act 2017 as originally enacted or made within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 9 April 2019.
- Privy Council Committees, released as part of a response from Privy Council Office (United Kingdom) to a request made using WhatDoTheyKnow, accessed 16 January 2015.
- N. Cox, Abolition or Retention of the Privy Council, Sect. 2.
- Gay and Rees, p. 6.
- Maitland, p. 463.
- "Role of the JCPC". Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. Archived from the original on 14 January 2014. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
- Iwi, p. 128.
- N. Cox, Abolition or Retention of the Privy Council, Sect. 11.
- "Do we need the Privy Council?". BBC News. 13 May 2009. Archived from the original on 3 September 2017. Retrieved 2 April 2010.
- ThirdWay—Google Boeken. March 1984. Archived from the original on 7 May 2012. Retrieved 13 August 2012.
- BBC Radio 4—What's the Point of ... The Privy Council Archived 16 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine, 12 May 2009
- "Civil Service Order in Council 1995 (as amended between 1995 and 2005)" (PDF). Civil Service Commissioners. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 July 2008. Retrieved 7 June 2010.
- "Secretary of State for the Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs v Bancoult, R (on the application of) 2007 EWCA Civ 498 (23 May 2007)". Archived from the original on 7 May 2015. Retrieved 12 May 2009.
- BBC—Court victory for Chagos families Archived 14 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine, 11 May 2006
- "Judgments—R (On The Application of Bancoult) V Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 6 October 2014.
- "Privy Council members". Privy Council Office. Archived from the original on 6 December 2014. Retrieved 15 June 2015.
- N. Cox, Peerage Privileges, pp. 25–6.
- Hayter, Sect. 7.177.
- "Jones informed of Syria drone strike". BBC. Archived from the original on 12 September 2015. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
- Hayter, Sect. 1.37.
- "Respect Brexit decision, peers urged". BBC. 20 February 2017. Archived from the original on 20 February 2017. Retrieved 20 February 2017.
- Blackstone, I. 318.
- Walker, A; Wood, E (14 February 2000). "The Parliamentary Oath" (PDF). Research Paper 00/17. House of Commons Library. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 August 2000. Retrieved 8 September 2008.
- "Privy Council". BBC. 19 May 1998. Archived from the original on 6 July 2004. Retrieved 29 August 2008.
- "Modernisation of the House of CommonsFourth Report: Precedence for Privy Counsellors". Modernisation of the House of Commons Select Committee. 4 March 1998. Archived from the original on 5 March 2009. Retrieved 8 September 2008.
- "Privy Counsellors and Crown Appointments". Debrett's. Archived from the original on 28 May 2016. Retrieved 15 June 2015.
- "Letters after the name". Debrett's. Archived from the original on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
In a social style of address for a peer who is a privy counsellor it is advisable that the letters PC should follow the name. For all other members of the Privy Council the prefix ‘Rt Hon’ before the name is sufficient identification.
- "Peers". Forms of address. Ministry of Justice. 2008. Archived from the original on 27 August 2008. Retrieved 11 September 2008.
- Blackstone, I. Chapter 5.
- "Privy Council Records". National Records of Scotland. Archived from the original on 9 January 2017. Retrieved 8 January 2017.
- O'Gorman, Frank (2016). The Long Eighteenth Century: British Political and Social History 1688–1832. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 65. ISBN 9781472507747. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 8 September 2017.
- Black, Jeremy (1993). The politics of Britain, 1688–1800. Manchester University Press. p. 13. ISBN 0719037611. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 8 September 2017.
- Rayment, Leigh (27 May 2014). "Privy Counsellors—Ireland". Archived from the original on 26 September 2008. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
- "The Queen's Privy Council for Canada". Privy Council Office. 13 February 2008. Archived from the original on 5 March 2009. Retrieved 3 August 2008.
- "Federal Executive Council Handbook" (PDF). Australian Government, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. June 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 July 2007. Retrieved 9 September 2008.
- "Executive Council". New Zealand Government, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Archived from the original on 3 July 2008. Retrieved 9 September 2008.
- Blackstone, W (1838). Commentaries on the Laws of England. New York: W.E. Dean.
- Brazier, R (1997). Ministers of the Crown. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-825988-3.
- Cox, H (1854). The British Commonwealth, Or, A Commentary on the Institutions and Principles of British Government. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans. p. 389.
privy council reappointed demise.
- Cox, N (2002). "The Abolition or Retention of the Privy Council as the Final Court of Appeal for New Zealand: Conflict Between National Identity and Legal Pragmatism". New Zealand Universities Law Review. 20. doi:10.2139/ssrn.420373. S2CID 150529602.
- Cox, N (2008). "Peerage Privileges since the House of Lords Act 1999". Selected Works of Noel Cox. Berkeley Electronic Press. Retrieved 29 August 2008.
- Dicey, A (1887). The Privy Council: the Arnold prize essay, 1860. London.
- Elton, Geoffrey Rudolph. (1953). The Tudor Revolution in Government: Administrative Changes in the Reign of Henry VIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511561115, ISBN 9780511561115
- Gay, O; Rees, A (2005). "The Privy Council" (PDF). House of Commons Library Standard Note. SN/PC/2708. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 June 2010. Retrieved 13 May 2010.
- Goodnow, F (1897). Comparative Administrative Law: an Analysis of the Administrative Systems, National and Local, of the United States, England, France and Germany. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons. ISBN 978-1-58477-622-2.
- Hayter, P (2007). Companion to the Standing Orders and guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords (21st ed.). Archived from the original on 19 November 2008.
- Iwi, E (1937). "A Plea for an Imperial Privy Council and Judicial Committee". Transactions of the Grotius Society. Transactions of the Grotius Society, Vol. 23. 23: 127–146. JSTOR 742946.
- Maitland, F (1911). The constitutional history of England: a course of lectures. Cambridge.
- Michael Pulman (1971) The Elizabethan Privy Council in the Fifteen Seventies (Berkeley: University of California Press)
- Warshaw, S (1996). Powersharing: White House—Cabinet relations in the modern presidency. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press. ISBN 0-7914-2869-9.
- David Rogers (2015) By Royal Appointment : Tales from the Privy Council—the unknown arm of Government, London : Biteback Publishing.
- Privy Council Office homepage
- Judicial Committee of the Privy Council homepage
- BBC: Do we need the Privy Council?; BBC Radio 4: Whats the point of the Privy Council?
- BBC: Privy Council: Guide to its origins, powers and members, 8 October 2015
- "Privy Counsellors". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). House of Lords. 12 May 2009. col. 998–1013.
- Guardian Comment – Roy Hattersley on the Privy Council