|c. 1050–150 BC|
|ISO 15924||Phnx, 115 , Phoenician|
The Phoenician alphabet is also called the Early Linear script (in a Semitic context, not connected to Minoan writing systems), because it is an early development of the pictographic Proto- or Old Canaanite script, into a linear, alphabetic script, also marking the transfer from a multi-directional writing system, where a variety of writing directions occurred, to a regulated horizontal, right-to-left script. Its immediate predecessor, the Proto-Canaanite, Old Canaanite or early West Semitic alphabet, used in the final stages of the Late Bronze Age first in Canaan and then in the Syro-Hittite kingdoms, is the oldest fully matured alphabet, thought to be derived from Egyptian hieroglyphs.
The Phoenician alphabet was used to write the Early Iron Age Canaanite languages, subcategorized by historians as Phoenician, Hebrew, Moabite, Ammonite and Edomite, as well as Old Aramaic. Its use in Phoenicia (coastal Levant) led to its wide dissemination outside of the Canaanite sphere, spread by Phoenician merchants across the Mediterranean world, where it was adopted and modified by many other cultures. It became one of the most widely used writing systems. The Phoenician alphabet proper remained in use in Ancient Carthage until the 2nd century BC (known as the Punic language), while elsewhere it diversified into numerous national alphabets, including the Aramaic and Samaritan, several Anatolian scripts, and the early Greek alphabets. In the Near East, the Aramaic alphabet became especially successful, giving rise to the Jewish square script and Perso-Arabic scripts, among others.
"Phoenician proper" consists of 22 consonant letters only, leaving vowel sounds implicit, although certain late varieties use matres lectionis for some vowels. As the letters were originally incised with a stylus, they are mostly angular and straight, although cursive versions steadily gained popularity, culminating in the Neo-Punic alphabet of Roman-era North Africa. Phoenician was usually written right to left, though some texts alternate directions (boustrophedon).
The earliest known alphabetic (or "proto-alphabetic") inscriptions are the so-called Proto-Sinaitic (or Proto-Canaanite) script sporadically attested in the Sinai and in Canaan in the late Middle and Late Bronze Age. The script was not widely used until the rise of Syro-Hittite states in the 13th and 12th centuries BC.
The Phoenician alphabet is a direct continuation of the "Proto-Canaanite" script of the Bronze Age collapse period. The inscriptions found on arrowheads at al-Khader near Bethlehem and dated to c.1100 BCE offered the epigraphists the "missing link" between the two. The so-called Ahiram epitaph, whose dating is controversial, engraved on the sarcophagus of king Ahiram in Byblos, Lebanon, one of five known Byblian royal inscriptions, shows essentially the fully developed Phoenician script, although the name "Phoenician" is by convention given to inscriptions beginning in the mid-11th century BC.
Spread and adaptations
Beginning in the 9th century BC, adaptations of the Phoenician alphabet thrived, including Greek, Old Italic and Anatolian scripts. The alphabet's attractive innovation was its phonetic nature, in which one sound was represented by one symbol, which meant only a few dozen symbols to learn. The other scripts of the time, cuneiform and Egyptian hieroglyphs, employed many complex characters and required long professional training to achieve proficiency; which had restricted literacy to a small elite.
Another reason for its success was the maritime trading culture of Phoenician merchants, which spread the alphabet into parts of North Africa and Southern Europe. Phoenician inscriptions have been found in archaeological sites at a number of former Phoenician cities and colonies around the Mediterranean, such as Byblos (in present-day Lebanon) and Carthage in North Africa. Later finds indicate earlier use in Egypt.
The alphabet had long-term effects on the social structures of the civilizations that came in contact with it. Its simplicity not only allowed its easy adaptation to multiple languages, but it also allowed the common people to learn how to write. This upset the long-standing status of literacy as an exclusive achievement of royal and religious elites, scribes who used their monopoly on information to control the common population. The appearance of Phoenician disintegrated many of these class divisions, although many Middle Eastern kingdoms, such as Assyria, Babylonia and Adiabene, would continue to use cuneiform for legal and liturgical matters well into the Common Era.
According to Herodotus, the Phoenician prince Cadmus was accredited with the introduction of the Phoenician alphabet—phoinikeia grammata, "Phoenician letters"—to the Greeks, who adapted it to form their Greek alphabet. Herodotus claims that the Greeks did not know of the Phoenician alphabet before Cadmus. He estimates that Cadmus lived sixteen hundred years before his time (while the historical adoption of the alphabet by the Greeks was barely 350 years before Herodotus).
The Phoenician alphabet was known to the Jewish sages of the Second Temple era, who called it the "Old Hebrew" (Paleo-Hebrew) script.
The conventional date of 1050 BC for the emergence of the Phoenician script was chosen because there is a gap in the epigraphic record; there are not actually any Phoenician inscriptions securely dated to the 11th century. The oldest inscriptions are dated to the 10th century.
- KAI 1: Ahiram sarcophagus, Byblos, c. 850 BC.
- KAI 14: Eshmunazar II sarcophagus, 5th century BC.
- KAI 15-16: Bodashtart inscriptions, 4th century BC.
- KAI 24: Kilamuwa Stela, 9th century BC.
- KAI 46: Nora Stone, c. 800 BC.
- KAI 47: Cippi of Melqart inscription, 2nd century BC.
- KAI 26: Karatepe bilingual, 8th century BC
- KAI 277: Pyrgi Tablets, Phoenician-Etruscan bilingual, c. 500 BC.
- Çineköy inscription, Phoenician-Luwian bilingual, 8th century BC.
(Note: KAI = Kanaanäische und Aramäische Inschriften)
The Phoenician alphabet was deciphered in 1758 by Jean-Jacques Barthélemy, but its relation to the Phoenicians remained unknown until the 19th century. It was at first believed that the script was a direct variation of Egyptian hieroglyphs, which were deciphered by Champollion in the early 19th century.
However, scholars could not find any link between the two writing systems, nor to hieratic or cuneiform. The theories of independent creation ranged from the idea of a single individual conceiving it, to the Hyksos people forming it from corrupt Egyptian. It was eventually discovered that the Proto-Sinaitic alphabet was inspired by the model of hieroglyphs.
Table of letters
The chart shows the graphical evolution of Phoenician letter forms into other alphabets. The sound values also changed significantly, both at the initial creation of new alphabets and from gradual pronunciation changes which did not immediately lead to spelling changes. The Phoenician letter forms shown are idealized: actual Phoenician writing is less uniform, with significant variations by era and region.
When alphabetic writing began, with the early Greek alphabet, the letter forms were similar but not identical to Phoenician, and vowels were added to the consonant-only Phoenician letters. There were also distinct variants of the writing system in different parts of Greece, primarily in how those Phoenician characters that did not have an exact match to Greek sounds were used. The Ionic variant evolved into the standard Greek alphabet, and the Cumae variant into the Italic alphabets (including the Latin alphabet).
The Runic alphabet is derived from Italic, the Cyrillic alphabet from medieval Greek. The Hebrew, Syriac and Arabic scripts are derived from Aramaic (the latter as a medieval cursive variant of Nabataean). Ge'ez is from South Arabian.
|Letter||Name||Meaning||Transliteration||Phoneme||Origin||Corresponding letter in|
|Image||Text||Egyptian hieroglyphs||Proto-Sinaitic||Samaritan||Aramaic||Hebrew||Syriac||Parthian||Arabic||South Arabian||Ge'ez||Greek||Latin||Cyrillic||Brahmi||Devanagari||Mongolian|
|𐤀||ʾālep||ox, head of cattle||ʾ||ʾ [ʔ]||𓃾||ࠀ||𐡀||א||ܐ||𐭀||ﺍ, ء||𐩱||አ||Αα||Aa||Аа||𑀅 /a/||अ /a/||ᠠ, ᠡ|
|𐤁||bēt||house||b||b [b]||𓉐||ࠁ||𐡁||ב||ܒ||𐭁||ﺏ||𐩨||በ||Ββ||Bb||Бб, Вв||𑀩 /b/||ब /b/||ᠧ, ᠸ|
|𐤂||gīml||throwing stick (or camel)||g||g [ɡ]||𓌙||ࠂ||𐡂||ג||ܓ||𐭂||ﺝ||𐩴||ገ||Γγ||Cc, Gg||Гг, Ґґ||𑀕 /g/||ग /g/||ᠬ, ᠭ|
|𐤃||dālet||door (or fish)||d||d [d]||𓇯||ࠃ||𐡃||ד||ܕ||𐭃||د, ذ||𐩵||ደ||Δδ||Dd||Дд||𑀥 /dʰ/||ध /dʰ/||—|
|𐤄||he||window (or jubilation)||h||hʾ [h]||𓀠?||ࠄ||𐡄||ה||ܗ||𐭄||ه||𐩠||ሀ||Εε||Ee||Ее, Єє, Ээ||𑀳 /ɦ/||ह /ɦ/||—|
|𐤅||wāw||hook||w||w [w]||𓏲||ࠅ||𐡅||ו||ܘ||𐭅||ﻭ||𐩥||ወ||(Ϝϝ), Υυ||Ff, Uu, Vv, Yy, Ww||Ѵѵ, Уу, Ўў||𑀯 /v/||व /v/||ᠣ, ᠤ, ᠥ, ᠦ|
|𐤆||zajin, zayin||weapon (or manacle)||z||z [z]||𓏭||ࠆ||𐡆||ז||ܙ||𐭆||ﺯ||𐩹||ዘ||Ζζ||Zz||Зз||𑀚 /ɟ/||ज /dʒ/||ᠰ᠋|
|𐤇||hēt||courtyard/wall (?)||ḥ||ḥ [ħ]||𓉗/𓈈?||ࠇ||𐡇||ח||ܚ||𐭇||ح, خ||𐩢, 𐩭||ሐ, ኀ||Ηη||Hh||Ии, Йй||𑀖 /gʰ/||घ /gʰ/||ᠬ, ᠭ|
|𐤈||ṭēt||wheel||ṭ||ṭ [tˤ]||𓄤?||ࠈ||𐡈||ט||ܛ||𐭈||ط, ظ||𐩷||ጠ||Θθ||—||Ѳѳ||𑀣 /tʰ/||थ /tʰ/||—|
|𐤉||yod||arm, hand||j||y [j]||𓂝||ࠉ||𐡉||י||ܝ||𐭉||ي||𐩺||የ||Ιι||Ii, Jj||Іі, Її, Јј||𑀬 /j/||य /j/||ᠢ, ᠵ, ᠶ|
|𐤊||kāp||palm of a hand||k||k [k]||𓂧||ࠊ||𐡊||כך||ܟ||𐭊||ﻙ||𐩫||ከ||Κκ||Kk||Кк||𑀓 /k/||क /k/||ᠬ, ᠭ|
|𐤋||lāmed||goad||l||l [l]||𓌅||ࠋ||𐡋||ל||ܠ||𐭋||ﻝ||𐩡||ለ||Λλ||Ll||Лл||𑀮 /l/||ल /l/||ᠲ, ᠲ|
|𐤌||mēm||water||m||m [m]||𓈖||ࠌ||𐡌||מם||ܡ||𐭌||ﻡ||𐩣||መ||Μμ||Mm||Мм||𑀫 /m/||म /m/||ᠮ|
|𐤍||nūn||serpent (or fish )||n||n [n]||𓆓||ࠍ||𐡍||נן||ܢ||𐭍||ﻥ||𐩬||ነ||Νν||Nn||Нн||𑀦 /n/||न /n/||ᠨ|
|𐤎||śāmek||pillar(?)||s||ś [s]||𓊽||ࠎ||𐡎||ס||ܣ ܤ||𐭎||𐩪||ሰ||Ξξ||Ѯѯ,||𑀱 /ʂ/||ष /ʂ/||ᠰ, ᠱ|
|𐤏||ʿayin||eye||ʿ||ʿ [ʕ]||𓁹||ࠏ||𐡏||ע||ܥ||𐭏||ع, غ||𐩲||ዐ||Οο, Ωω||Oo||Оо, Ѡѡ||𑀏 /e/||ए /e/||—|
|𐤐||pē||mouth (or corner)||p||p [p]||𓂋||ࠐ||𐡐||פף||ܦ||𐭐||ف||𐩰||ፐ, ፈ||Ππ||Pp||Пп||𑀧 /p/||प /p/||ᠪ|
|𐤑||ṩādē||papyrus plant/fish hook?||ṣ||ṣ [sˤ]||𓇑 ?||ࠑ||𐡑||צץ||ܨ||𐭑||ص, ض||𐩮||ጸ, ጰ, ፀ||(Ϻϻ)||—||Цц, Чч, Џџ||𑀘 /c/||च /tʃ/||ᠴ, ᠵ|
|𐤒||qōp||needle eye||q||q [q]||𓃻?||ࠒ||𐡒||ק||ܩ||𐭒||ﻕ||𐩤||ቀ||(Ϙϙ), Φφ||Ҁҁ||𑀔 /kʰ/||ख /kʰ/||—|
|𐤓||rēs, resh||head||r||r [r]||𓁶||ࠓ||𐡓||ר||ܪ||𐭓||ﺭ||𐩧||ረ||Ρρ||Rr||Рр||𑀭 /r/||र /r/||ᠯ, ᠷ|
|𐤔||šīn||tooth (or sun)||š||š [ʃ]||𓌓||ࠔ||𐡔||ש||ܫ||𐭔||ش, س||𐩦||ሠ||Σς||Ss||Сс, Шш, Щщ||𑀰 /ɕ/||श /ɕ/||ᠰ, ᠱ|
|𐤕||tāw||mark||t||t [t]||𓏴||ࠕ||𐡕||ת||ܬ||𐭕||ت, ث||𐩩||ተ||Ττ||Tt||Тт||𑀢 /t/||त /t/||ᠲ, ᠳ|
Phoenician used a system of acrophony to name letters: a word was chosen with each initial consonant sound, and became the name of the letter for that sound. These names were not arbitrary: each Phoenician letter was based on an Egyptian hieroglyph representing an Egyptian word; this word was translated into Phoenician (or a closely related Semitic language), then the initial sound of the translated word became the letter's Phoenician value. For example, the second letter of the Phoenician alphabet was based on the Egyptian hieroglyph for "house" (a sketch of a house); the Semitic word for "house" was bet; hence the Phoenician letter was called bet and had the sound value b.
According to a 1904 theory by Theodor Nöldeke, some of the letter names were changed in Phoenician from the Proto-Canaanite script. This includes:
- gaml "throwing stick" to gimel "camel"
- digg "fish" to dalet "door"
- hll "jubilation" to he "window"
- ziqq "manacle" to zayin "weapon"
- naḥš "snake" to nun "fish"
- piʾt "corner" to pe "mouth"
- šimš "sun" to šin "tooth"
The Phoenician numeral system consisted of separate symbols for 1, 10, 20, and 100. The sign for 1 was a simple vertical stroke (𐤖). Other numerals up to 9 were formed by adding the appropriate number of such strokes, arranged in groups of three. The symbol for 10 was a horizontal line or tack (𐤗). The sign for 20 (𐤘) could come in different glyph variants, one of them being a combination of two 10-tacks, approximately Z-shaped. Larger multiples of ten were formed by grouping the appropriate number of 20s and 10s. There existed several glyph variants for 100 (𐤙). The 100 symbol could be multiplied by a preceding numeral, e.g. the combination of "4" and "100" yielded 400. The system did not contain a numeral zero.
Many writing systems in use today can ultimately trace their descent to the Phoenician alphabet, and consequently Egyptian hieroglyphs. The Latin, Cyrillic, Armenian and Georgian scripts are derived from the Greek alphabet, which evolved from Phoenician; the Aramaic alphabet, also descended from Phoenician, evolved into the Arabic and Hebrew scripts. It has also been theorised that the Brahmi and subsequent Brahmic scripts of the Indian cultural sphere also descended from Aramaic, effectively uniting most of the world's writing systems under one family, although the theory is disputed.
Early Semitic scripts
The Paleo-Hebrew alphabet is a regional variant of the Phoenician alphabet, so called when used to write early Hebrew. The Samaritan alphabet is a development of Paleo-Hebrew, emerging in the 6th century BC. The South Arabian script may be derived from a stage of the Proto-Sinaitic script predating the mature development of the Phoenician alphabet proper. The Geʽez script developed from South Arabian.
The Phoenician alphabet continued to be used by the Samaritans and developed into the Samaritan alphabet, that is an immediate continuation of the Phoenician script without intermediate non-Israelite evolutionary stages. The Samaritans have continued to use the script for writing both Hebrew and Aramaic texts until the present day. A comparison of the earliest Samaritan inscriptions and the medieval and modern Samaritan manuscripts clearly indicates that the Samaritan script is a static script which was used mainly as a book hand.
The Aramaic alphabet, used to write Aramaic, is an early descendant of Phoenician. Aramaic, being the lingua franca of the Middle East, was widely adopted. It later split off (due to political divisions) into a number of related alphabets, including Hebrew, Syriac, and Nabataean, the latter of which, in its cursive form, became an ancestor of the Arabic alphabet. The Hebrew alphabet emerges in the Second Temple period, from around 300 BC, out of the Aramaic alphabet used in the Persian empire. There was, however, a revival of the Phoenician mode of writing later in the Second Temple period, with some instances from the Qumran Caves, such as the "Paleo-Hebrew Leviticus scroll" dated to the 2nd or 1st century BC.
By the 5th century BCE, among Jews the Phoenician alphabet had been mostly replaced by the Aramaic alphabet as officially used in the Persian empire (which, like all alphabetical writing systems, was itself ultimately a descendant of the Proto-Canaanite script, though through intermediary non-Israelite stages of evolution). The "Jewish square-script" variant now known simply as the Hebrew alphabet evolved directly out of the Aramaic script by about the 3rd century BCE (although some letter shapes did not become standard until the 1st century CE).
The Kharosthi script is an Arabic-derived alphasyllabary used in the Indo-Greek Kingdom in the 3rd century BC. The Syriac alphabet is the derived form of Aramaic used in the early Christian period. The Sogdian alphabet is derived from Syriac. It is in turn an ancestor of the Old Uyghur. The Manichaean alphabet is a further derivation from Sogdian.
The Arabic script is a medieval cursive variant of Nabataean, itself an offshoot of Aramaic.
It has been proposed, notably by Georg Bühler (1898), that the Brahmi script of India (and by extension the derived Indic alphabets) was ultimately derived from the Aramaic script, which would make Phoenician the ancestor of virtually every alphabetic writing system in use today, with the notable exception of written Korean (whose influence from the Brahmi-derived 'Phags-pa script has been theorized but acknowledged to be limited at best, and cannot be said to have derived from 'Phags-pa as 'Phags-pa derived from Tibetan and Tibetan from Brahmi).
It is certain that the Aramaic-derived Kharosthi script was present in northern India by the 4th century BC, so that the Aramaic model of alphabetic writing would have been known in the region, but the link from Kharosthi to the slightly younger Brahmi is tenuous. Bühler's suggestion is still entertained in mainstream scholarship, but it has never been proven conclusively, and no definitive scholarly consensus exists.
The Greek alphabet is derived from the Phoenician. With a different phonology, the Greeks adapted the Phoenician script to represent their own sounds, including the vowels absent in Phoenician. It was possibly more important in Greek to write out vowel sounds: Phoenician being a Semitic language, words were based on consonantal roots that permitted extensive removal of vowels without loss of meaning, a feature absent in the Indo-European Greek. However, Akkadian cuneiform, which wrote a related Semitic language, did indicate vowels, which suggests the Phoenicians simply accepted the model of the Egyptians, who never wrote vowels. In any case, the Greeks repurposed the Phoenician letters of consonant sounds not present in Greek; each such letter had its name shorn of its leading consonant, and the letter took the value of the now-leading vowel. For example, ʾāleph, which designated a glottal stop in Phoenician, was repurposed to represent the vowel /a/; he became /e/, ḥet became /eː/ (a long vowel), ʿayin became /o/ (because the pharyngeality altered the following vowel), while the two semi-consonants wau and yod became the corresponding high vowels, /u/ and /i/. (Some dialects of Greek, which did possess /h/ and /w/, continued to use the Phoenician letters for those consonants as well.)
The Alphabets of Asia Minor are generally assumed to be offshoots of archaic versions of the Greek alphabet. Similarly, the early Paleohispanic scripts are either derived from archaic Greek or from the Phoenician script directly; the Greco-Iberian alphabet of the 4th century BC is directly adapted from Greek.
The Latin alphabet was derived from Old Italic (originally a form of the Greek alphabet), used for Etruscan and other languages. The origin of the Runic alphabet is disputed: the main theories are that it evolved either from the Latin alphabet itself, some early Old Italic alphabet via the Alpine scripts, or the Greek alphabet. Despite this debate, the Runic alphabet is clearly derived from one or more scripts that ultimately trace their roots back to the Phoenician alphabet.
The Coptic alphabet is mostly based on the mature Greek alphabet of the Hellenistic period, with a few additional letters for sounds not in Greek at the time. Those additional letters are based on the Demotic script.
(32 code points)
|Assigned||29 code points|
|Unused||3 reserved code points|
|Unicode version history|
|5.0 (2006)||27 (+27)|
|5.2 (2009)||29 (+2)|
The Phoenician alphabet was added to the Unicode Standard in July 2006 with the release of version 5.0. An alternative proposal to handle it as a font variation of Hebrew was turned down. (See PDF summary.)
The Unicode block for Phoenician is U+10900–U+1091F. It is intended for the representation of text in Paleo-Hebrew, Archaic Phoenician, Phoenician, Early Aramaic, Late Phoenician cursive, Phoenician papyri, Siloam Hebrew, Hebrew seals, Ammonite, Moabite and Punic.
The letters are encoded U+10900 𐤀 aleph through to U+10915 𐤕 taw, U+10916 𐤖, U+10917 𐤗, U+10918 𐤘 and U+10919 𐤙 encode the numerals 1,10,20 and 100 respectively and U+1091F 𐤟 is the word separator.
Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF)
The following Unicode-related documents record the purpose and process of defining specific characters in the Phoenician block:
|Version||Final code points||Count||L2 ID||WG2 ID||Document|
|5.0||U+10900..10919, 1091F||27||N1579||Everson, Michael (1997-05-27), Proposal for encoding the Phoenician script|
|L2/97-288||N1603||Umamaheswaran, V. S. (1997-10-24), "8.24.1", Unconfirmed Meeting Minutes, WG 2 Meeting # 33, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 20 June – 4 July 1997|
|L2/99-013||N1932||Everson, Michael (1998-11-23), Revised proposal for encoding the Phoenician script in the UCS|
|L2/99-224||N2097, N2025-2||Röllig, W. (1999-07-23), Comments on proposals for the Universal Multiple-Octed Coded Character Set|
|N2133||Response to comments on the question of encoding Old Semitic scripts in the UCS (N2097), 1999-10-04|
|L2/00-010||N2103||Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2000-01-05), "10.4", Minutes of WG 2 meeting 37, Copenhagen, Denmark: 1999-09-13—16|
|L2/04-149||Kass, James; Anderson, Deborah W.; Snyder, Dean; Lehmann, Reinhard G.; Cowie, Paul James; Kirk, Peter; Cowan, John; Khalaf, S. George; Richmond, Bob (2004-05-25), Miscellaneous Input on Phoenician Encoding Proposal|
|L2/04-141R2||N2746R2||Everson, Michael (2004-05-29), Final proposal for encoding the Phoenician script in the UCS|
|L2/04-177||Anderson, Deborah (2004-05-31), Expert Feedback on Phoenician|
|L2/04-178||N2772||Anderson, Deborah (2004-06-04), Additional Support for Phoenician|
|L2/04-181||Keown, Elaine (2004-06-04), REBUTTAL to "Final proposal for encoding the Phoenician script in the UCS"|
|L2/04-190||N2787||Everson, Michael (2004-06-06), Additional examples of the Phoenician script in use|
|L2/04-187||McGowan, Rick (2004-06-07), Phoenician Recommendation|
|L2/04-206||N2793||Kirk, Peter (2004-06-07), Response to the revised "Final proposal for encoding the Phoenician script" (L2/04-141R2)|
|L2/04-213||Rosenne, Jony (2004-06-07), Responses to Several Hebrew Related Items|
|L2/04-217R||Keown, Elaine (2004-06-07), Proposal to add Archaic Mediterranean Script block to ISO 10646|
|L2/04-226||Durusau, Patrick (2004-06-07), Statement of the Society of Biblical Literature on WG2 N2746R2|
|L2/04-218||N2792||Snyder, Dean (2004-06-08), Response to the Proposal to Encode Phoenician in Unicode|
|L2/05-009||N2909||Anderson, Deborah (2005-01-19), Letters in support of Phoenician|
|5.2||U+1091A..1091B||2||N3353 (pdf, doc)||Umamaheswaran, V. S. (2007-10-10), "M51.14", Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 51 Hanzhou, China; 2007-04-24/27|
|L2/07-206||N3284||Everson, Michael (2007-07-25), Proposal to add two numbers for the Phoenician script|
|L2/07-225||Moore, Lisa (2007-08-21), "Phoenician", UTC #112 Minutes|
- History of writing
- Writing system
- Ugaritic alphabet
- The date of 1050 BC is conventional, the oldest known inscriptions are from the 10th century BC; the predecessor scripts used in the Syro-Hittite kingdoms of the 13th to 12th centuries BC is classified as "Proto-Canaanite". Use of the Phoenician script declined during the Hellenistic period as its evolved forms replaced it; it became obsolete with the destruction of Carthage in 149 BC.
- Himelfarb, Elizabeth J. "First Alphabet Found in Egypt", Archaeology 53, Issue 1 (January/February 2000): 21.
- Fischer, Steven Roger (2004). A history of writing. Reaktion Books. p. 90.
- Cross, Frank Moore (1980). "Newly Found Inscriptions in Old Canaanite and Early Phoenician Scripts". Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The American Schools of Oriental Research. 238 (238 (Spring, 1980)): 1–20. doi:10.2307/1356511. JSTOR 1356511. S2CID 222445150.
- Beyond Babel: A Handbook for Biblical Hebrew and Related Languages, article by Charles R. Krahmalkov (ed. John Kaltner, Steven L. McKenzie, 2002). "This alphabet was not, as often mistakenly asserted, invented by the Phoenicians but, rather, was an adaptation of the early West Semitic alphabet to the needs of their own language".
- Michael C. Howard (2012). Transnationalism in Ancient and Medieval Societies. P. 23.
- Cross, Frank Moore (1991). Senner, Wayne M. (ed.). The Invention and Development of the Alphabet. The Origins of Writing. Bison books. U of Nebraska Press. pp. 77–90 . ISBN 978-0-8032-9167-6. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
- Coulmas (1989) p. 141.
- Markoe (2000) p. 111
- Hock and Joseph (1996) p. 85.
- Daniels (1996) p. 94-95.
- "Discovery of Egyptian Inscriptions Indicates an Earlier Date for Origin of the Alphabet". Retrieved 20 April 2017.
- Fischer (2003) p. 68-69.
- Herodotus, Histories, Book V, 58.
- Herodotus. Histories, Book II, 145
- The Mishnah, ed. Herbert Danby, Oxford University Press: Oxford 1933, p. 784, s.v. Yadayim 4:5-6, note 6) (ISBN 0-19-815402-X); Babylonian Talmud Zevahim 62a; Sanhedrin 22a
- Hoffman, Joel M. (2004). In the beginning : a short history of the Hebrew language. New York, NY [u.a.]: New York Univ. Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-8147-3654-8. Retrieved 23 May 2017.
By 1000 B.C.E., however, we see Phoenician writings [..]
- Jensen (1969), p. 256.
- Jensen (1969), pp. 256–258.
- Krahmalkov, Charles R. (2001). A Phoenician Punic grammar. Brill. pp. 20–27. ISBN 9004117717. OCLC 237631007.
- after Fischer, Steven R. (2001). A History of Writing. London: Reaction Books. p. 126.
- Theodor Nöldeke (1904)
- The letters he and ḥēt continue three Proto-Sinaitic letters, ḥasir "courtyard", hillul "jubilation" and ḫayt "thread". The shape of ḥēt continues ḥasir "courtyard", but the name continues ḫayt "thread". The shape of he continues hillul "jubilation" but the name means "window". see: He (letter)#Origins.
- The glyph was taken to represent a wheel, but it possibly derives from the hieroglyph nefer hieroglyph 𓄤 and would originally have been called tab טוב "good".
- The root l-m-d mainly means "to teach", from an original meaning "to goad". H3925 in Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance to the Bible, 1979.
- the letter name nūn is a word for "fish", but the glyph is presumably from the depiction of a snake, which would point to an original name נחש "snake".
- the letter name may be from צד "to hunt".
- Jensen (1969) p. 262-263.
- Yigael Yadin, The Art of Warfare in Biblical Lands. McGraw-Hill, 1963. The Samech – a quick war ladder, later to become the '$' dollar sign drawing the three internal lines quickly. The 'Z' shaped Zayin – an ancient boomerang used for hunting. The 'H' shaped Het – mammoth tuffs.
- "Phoenician numerals in Unicode" (PDF). Retrieved 20 April 2017.
- "Number Systems". Retrieved 20 April 2017.
- Richard Salomon, "Brahmi and Kharoshthi", in The World's Writing Systems
- Daniélou, Alain (2003). A Brief History of India. Simon and Schuster. pp. 52–53. ISBN 9781594777943.
- The Korean language reform of 1446: the origin, background, and Early History of the Korean Alphabet, Gari Keith Ledyard. University of California, 1966, p. 367–368.
- Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, The World's Writing Systems (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 219-220
- Humphrey, John William (2006). Ancient technology. Greenwood guides to historic events of the ancient world (illustrated ed.). Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 219. ISBN 9780313327636. Retrieved 2009-10-18.
- Spurkland, Terje (2005): Norwegian Runes and Runic Inscriptions, translated by Betsy van der Hoek, Boydell Press, Woodbridge, pp. 3–4
- "Unicode character database". The Unicode Standard. Retrieved 2016-07-09.
- "Enumerated Versions of The Unicode Standard". The Unicode Standard. Retrieved 2016-07-09.
- "Middle-East scripts II: Ancient Scripts" (PDF). The Unicode Standard: Version 13.0 – Core Specification. The Unicode Consortium. 2020. Retrieved 2021-01-28.
- Jean-Pierre Thiollet, Je m'appelle Byblos, H & D, Paris, 2005. ISBN 2-914266-04-9
- Maria Eugenia Aubet, The Phoenicians and the West Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, London, 2001.
- Daniels, Peter T., et al. eds. The World's Writing Systems Oxford. (1996).
- Jensen, Hans, Sign, Symbol, and Script, G.P. Putman's Sons, New York, 1969.
- Coulmas, Florian, Writing Systems of the World, Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, 1989.
- Hock, Hans H. and Joseph, Brian D., Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship, Mouton de Gruyter, New York, 1996.
- Fischer, Steven R., A History of Writing, Reaktion Books, 1999.
- Markoe, Glenn E., Phoenicians. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-22613-5 (2000) (hardback)
- "Alphabet, Hebrew". Encyclopaedia Judaica (CD-ROM Edition Version 1.0). Ed. Cecil Roth. Keter Publishing House. ISBN 965-07-0665-8
- Feldman, Rachel (2010). "Most ancient Hebrew biblical inscription deciphered". Archived from the original on 7 June 2011. Retrieved 15 June 2011.
- Shanks, Hershel (2010). "Oldest Hebrew Inscription Discovered in Israelite Fort on Philistine Border". Biblical Archaeology Review. 36 (2): 51–6.
- Ancient Scripts.com (Phoenician)
- Omniglot.com (Phoenician alphabet)
- official Unicode standards document for Phoenician (PDF file)
- Free-Libre GPL2 Licensed Unicode Phoenician Font
- GNU FreeFont Unicode font family with Phoenician range in its serif face.
- Phönizisch TTF-Font.
- Ancient Hebrew and Aramaic on Coins, reading and transliterating Proto-Hebrew, online edition. (Judaea Coin Archive)
- Paleo-Hebrew Abjad font (also allows writing in Phoenician)