# Arabic numerals

**Arabic numerals** are the ten digits: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. The term often implies a decimal number written using these digits (in particular when contrasted with *Roman numerals*). However, the term can also refer to the digits themselves, such as in the statement "octal numbers are written using Arabic numerals."

The numerals were developed in the Western Arabic World (northwest Africa and modern-day Spain), long after the concept of decimal which can be traced back to India. It was in the Algerian city of Bejaia that the Italian scholar Fibonacci first encountered the numerals; his work was crucial in making them known throughout Europe. [1] European trade, books, and colonialism helped popularize the adoption of Arabic numerals around the world. The numerals have found worldwide use significantly beyond the contemporary spread of the Latin alphabet, intruding into the writing systems in regions where other numerals had been in use, such as Chinese and Japanese writing.

The numerals used in (most cases of) Arabic writing are different and are called Eastern Arabic numerals. The *Oxford English Dictionary* uses lowercase *Arabic numerals* to refer to Western digits, and capitalized *Arabic Numerals* to refer to the Eastern digits.[2]

Other alternative names are *Western Arabic numerals* and *Western numerals*. Unicode just uses the unadorned term *digits*.[3]

## History

### Decimal

The decimal numeral system was developed in India by around 700.[6] The development was gradual, spanning several centuries, but the decisive step was probably provided by Brahmagupta's formulation of zero as a numeral in 628.

The numeral system came to be known to the court of Baghdad, where mathematicians such as the Persian Al-Khwarizmi, whose book *On the Calculation with Hindu Numerals* (Arabic: الجمع والتفريق بالحساب الهندي *Al-Jam` wal-Tafrīq bil-Ḥisāb al-Hindī*) was written about 825 in Arabic, and then the Arab mathematician Al-Kindi, who wrote four volumes, *On the Use of the Indian Numerals* (Arabic: كتاب في استعمال الأعداد الهندية *Kitāb fī Isti`māl al-'A`dād al-Hindīyyah*) in about 830. Their work was principally responsible for the diffusion of the Indian system of numeration in the Middle East and the West.[7]

Middle-Eastern mathematicians extended the decimal numeral system to include fractions, as recorded in a treatise by the Arab mathematician Abu'l-Hasan al-Uqlidisi in 952–953. The decimal point notation was introduced by Sind ibn Ali, who also wrote the earliest treatise on Arabic numerals.

### The digits and names

According to Al-Biruni, there were multiple forms of numerals in use in India, and "Arabs chose among them what appeared to them most useful". Al-Nasawi wrote in the early eleventh century that the mathematicians had not agreed on the form of numerals, but most of them had agreed to train themselves with the forms now known as Eastern Arabic numerals.[8] The oldest specimens of the written numerals available from Egypt in 873–874 show three forms of the numeral "2" and two forms of the numeral "3", and these variations indicate the divergence between what later became known as the Eastern Arabic numerals and the (Western) Arabic numerals.[9]

The digits developed in Maghreb and Al-Andalus are the direct ancestor of the modern Arabic numerals.[10][11][12]

Calculations were originally performed using a dust board (*takht*, Latin: *tabula*) which involved writing symbols with a stylus and erasing them as part of calculations. Al-Uqlidisi then invented a system of calculations with ink and paper "without board and erasing" (*bi-ghayr takht wa-lā maḥw bal bi-dawāt wa-qirṭās*).[13] The use of the dust board appears to have introduced a divergence in terminology as well: whereas the Hindu reckoning was called *ḥisāb al-hindī* in the east, it was called *ḥisāb al-ghubār* in the west (literally, "calculation with dust").[14] The numerals themselves were referred to in the west as *ashkāl al‐ghubār* (dust figures, in Ibn al-Yāsamin) or *qalam al-ghubår* (dust letters).[15] The divergence in the terminology has led some scholars to propose that the Western Arabic numerals had a separate origin in the so-called "*ghubār* numerals" but the available evidence indicates no separate origin.[16]

Woepecke has also proposed that the Western Arabic numerals were already in use in Spain before the arrival of the Moors, purportedly received via Alexandria, but this theory is not accepted by scholars.[17][18][19]

Some popular myths argue that the original forms of these symbols indicated their numeric value through the number of angles they contained, but no evidence exists of any such origin.[20]

### Adoption in Europe

The reason the digits are more commonly known as "Arabic numerals" in Europe and the Americas is that they were introduced to Europe in the 10th century by Arabic-speakers of North Africa, who were then using the digits from Libya to Morocco. Arabs were also using the Eastern Arabic numerals (٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩) in other areas.

The first mentions of the numerals in the West are found in the *Codex Vigilanus* of 976.[21]

From the 980s, Gerbert of Aurillac (later, Pope Sylvester II) used his position to spread knowledge of the numerals in Europe. Gerbert studied in Barcelona in his youth. He was known to have requested mathematical treatises concerning the astrolabe from Lupitus of Barcelona after he had returned to France.

Leonardo Fibonacci (Leonardo of Pisa), a mathematician born in the Republic of Pisa who had studied in Béjaïa (Bougie), Algeria, promoted the Indian numeral system in Europe with his 1202 book *Liber Abaci*:

When my father, who had been appointed by his country as public notary in the customs at Bugia acting for the Pisan merchants going there, was in charge, he summoned me to him while I was still a child, and having an eye to usefulness and future convenience, desired me to stay there and receive instruction in the school of accounting. There, when I had been introduced to the art of the Indians' nine symbols through remarkable teaching, knowledge of the art very soon pleased me above all else and I came to understand it.

The European acceptance of the numerals was accelerated by the invention of the printing press, and they became widely known during the 15th century. Early evidence of their use in Britain includes: an equal hour horary quadrant from 1396,[22] in England, a 1445 inscription on the tower of Heathfield Church, Sussex; a 1448 inscription on a wooden lych-gate of Bray Church, Berkshire; and a 1487 inscription on the belfry door at Piddletrenthide church, Dorset; and in Scotland a 1470 inscription on the tomb of the first Earl of Huntly in Elgin Cathedral. (See G.F. Hill, *The Development of Arabic Numerals in Europe* for more examples.) In central Europe, the King of Hungary Ladislaus the Posthumous, started the use of Arabic numerals, which appear for the first time in a royal document of 1456.[23] By the mid-16th century, they were in common use in most of Europe.[24] Roman numerals remained in use mostly for the notation of anno Domini years, and for numbers on clockfaces.

The evolution of the numerals in early Europe is shown here in a table created by the French scholar Jean-Étienne Montucla in his *Histoire de la Mathematique*, which was published in 1757:

### Adoption in Russia

Cyrillic numerals were a numbering system derived from the Cyrillic alphabet, used by South and East Slavic peoples. The system was used in Russia as late as the early 18th century when Peter the Great replaced it with Arabic numerals.

## Encoding

The ten digits are encoded in virtually every character set designed for electric, radio, and digital communication, such as Morse code.

They are encoded in ASCII at positions 0x30 to 0x39. Masking to the lower 4 binary bits (or taking the last hexadecimal digit) gives the value of the digit, a great help in converting text to numbers on early computers. These positions were inherited in Unicode.[28] EBCDIC used different values, but also had the lower 4 bits equal to the digit value.

Binary | Octal | Decimal | Hex | Glyph | Unicode | EBCDIC (Hex) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

0011 0000 | 060 | 48 | 30 | 0 | U+0030 DIGIT ZERO | F0 |

0011 0001 | 061 | 49 | 31 | 1 | U+0031 DIGIT ONE | F1 |

0011 0010 | 062 | 50 | 32 | 2 | U+0032 DIGIT TWO | F2 |

0011 0011 | 063 | 51 | 33 | 3 | U+0033 DIGIT THREE | F3 |

0011 0100 | 064 | 52 | 34 | 4 | U+0034 DIGIT FOUR | F4 |

0011 0101 | 065 | 53 | 35 | 5 | U+0035 DIGIT FIVE | F5 |

0011 0110 | 066 | 54 | 36 | 6 | U+0036 DIGIT SIX | F6 |

0011 0111 | 067 | 55 | 37 | 7 | U+0037 DIGIT SEVEN | F7 |

0011 1000 | 070 | 56 | 38 | 8 | U+0038 DIGIT EIGHT | F8 |

0011 1001 | 071 | 57 | 39 | 9 | U+0039 DIGIT NINE | F9 |

## See also

- Text figures
- Abjad numerals
- Chinese numerals
- Counting rods – decimal positional numeral system with zero
- Decimal
- Seven-segment display
- Greek numerals
- Japanese numerals
- Maya numerals
- Regional variations in modern handwritten Arabic numerals

## Notes

## References

- "Arabic Numerals".
- "Arabic",
*Oxford English Dictionary*, 2nd edition - Official Unicode Consortium code chart
- Smith, David Eugene; Karpinski, Louis Charles (1911).
*The Hindu-Arabic numerals*. Boston, London, Ginn and Company. p. 52. - For a modern image
- O'Connor, J. J. and E. F. Robertson. 2000. Indian Numerals,
*MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive*, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St. Andrews, Scotland. - The MacTutor History of Mathematics archive
- Kunitzsch, The Transmission of Hindu-Arabic Numerals Reconsidered 2003, p. 7: "Les personnes qui se sont occupées de la science du calcul n'ont pas été d'accord sur une partie des formes de ces neuf signes; mais la plupart d'entre elles sont convenues de les former comme il suit."
- Kunitzsch, The Transmission of Hindu-Arabic Numerals Reconsidered 2003, p. 5.
- Kunitzsch, The Transmission of Hindu-Arabic Numerals Reconsidered 2003, pp. 12–13: "While specimens of Western Arabic numerals from the early period—the tenth to thirteenth centuries—are still not available, we know at least that Hindu reckoning (called
*ḥisāb al-ghubār*) was known in the West from the tenth century onward..." - "Why are arabic numerals so called when they look nothing like arabic numbers?".
- "Numbers, its inception, development and operations on it". Retrieved 2 August 2021.
- Kunitzsch, The Transmission of Hindu-Arabic Numerals Reconsidered 2003, pp. 7–8.
- Kunitzsch, The Transmission of Hindu-Arabic Numerals Reconsidered 2003, p. 8.
- Kunitzsch, The Transmission of Hindu-Arabic Numerals Reconsidered 2003, p. 10.
- Kunitzsch, The Transmission of Hindu-Arabic Numerals Reconsidered 2003, p. 10: 'I should think that, therefore, it is no longer justified for us to call the Western Arabic forms of the Hindu-Arabic numerals "ghubār numerals." Rather we should speak of the Eastern and the Western Arabic forms of the nine numerals.'
- Kunitzsch, The Transmission of Hindu-Arabic Numerals Reconsidered 2003, pp. 12–13: "Since edition of and research on the Pseudo-Boethius[41] we now know that the texts running under his name and carrying Arabic numerals date from the eleventh century. Thus the assumed way of transmission from Alexandria to Spain is impossible and this theory can no longer be taken as serious."
- Smith, D. E.; Karpinski, L. C. (2013) [first published in Boston, 1911],
*The Hindu-Arabic Numerals*, Dover, Chapter V, ISBN 978-0486155111 - Gandz, Solomon (November 1931), "The Origin of the Ghubār Numerals, or the Arabian Abacus and the Articuli",
*Isis*,**16**(2): 393–424, doi:10.1086/346615, JSTOR 224714, S2CID 144993740 - Ifrah, Georges (1998).
*The universal history of numbers: from prehistory to the invention of the computer; translated from the French by David Bellos*. London: Harvill Press. pp. 356–357. ISBN 9781860463242. - "MATHORIGINS.COM_V".
*www.mathorigins.com*. - "14th century timepiece unearthed in Qld farm shed".
*ABC News*. - Erdélyi: Magyar művelődéstörténet 1-2. kötet. Kolozsvár, 1913, 1918
- Mathforum.org
- Helaine Selin, ed. (1997).
*Encyclopaedia of the history of science, technology, and medicine in non-western cultures*. Springer. p. 198. ISBN 978-0-7923-4066-9. - Meuleman, Johan H. (2002).
*Islam in the era of globalization: Muslim attitudes towards modernity and identity*. Psychology Press. p. 272. ISBN 978-0-7007-1691-3. - Peng Yoke Ho (2000).
*Li, Qi and Shu: An Introduction to Science and Civilization in China*. Courier Dover Publications. p. 106. ISBN 978-0-486-41445-4. - https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0000.pdf

## Sources

- Kunitzsch, Paul (2003), "The Transmission of Hindu-Arabic Numerals Reconsidered", in J. P. Hogendijk; A. I. Sabra (eds.),
*The Enterprise of Science in Islam: New Perspectives*, MIT Press, pp. 3–22, ISBN 978-0-262-19482-2 - Plofker, Kim (2009),
*Mathematics in India*, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-12067-6

## Further reading

- Ore, Oystein (1988), "Hindu-Arabic numerals",
*Number Theory and Its History*, Dover, pp. 19–24, ISBN 0486656209. - Burnett, Charles (2006), "The Semantics of Indian Numerals in Arabic, Greek and Latin",
*Journal of Indian Philosophy*, Springer-Netherlands,**34**(1–2): 15–30, doi:10.1007/s10781-005-8153-z, S2CID 170783929. - Encyclopædia Britannica (Kim Plofker) (2007), "mathematics, South Asian",
*Encyclopædia Britannica Online*,**189**(4761): 1–12, Bibcode:1961Natur.189S.273., doi:10.1038/189273c0, S2CID 4288165, retrieved 18 May 2007. - Hayashi, Takao (1995),
*The Bakhshali Manuscript, An ancient Indian mathematical treatise*, Groningen: Egbert Forsten, ISBN 906980087X. - Ifrah, Georges (2000),
*A Universal History of Numbers: From Prehistory to Computers*, New York: Wiley, ISBN 0471393401. - Katz, Victor J., ed. (20 July 2007),
*The Mathematics of Egypt, Mesopotamia, China, India, and Islam: A Sourcebook*, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0691114859.

## External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
(category)Arabic numerals |

- Development of Hindu Arabic and Traditional Chinese Arithmetic
- History of Counting Systems and Numerals. Retrieved 11 December 2005.
- The Evolution of Numbers. 16 April 2005.
- O'Connor, J. J. and Robertson, E. F. Indian numerals. November 2000.
- History of the numerals