How to prove that the query oracle is unitary?

6

The query oracle: $O_{x}|i\rangle|b\rangle = |i\rangle|b \oplus x_{i}\rangle$ used in algorithms like Deutsch Jozsa is unitary. How do I prove it is unitary?

Divyat

Posted 2019-03-26T12:11:16.280

Reputation: 63

Related: Why are oracles Hermitian by construction? – Sanchayan Dutta – 2019-03-26T12:25:22.483

Answers

3

Notice that $\mathcal O_x$ is a permutation matrix.

The matrix elements are $$\langle j, c\rvert\mathcal O_x\lvert i,b\rangle =\delta_{ij}\langle c\rvert b\oplus x_i\rangle =\delta_{ij}\delta_{c,b\oplus x_i}.$$ In other words, $\mathcal O_x$ is diagonal with respect to the first register, and, for each block corresponding to a given $i$, connects all and only the indices $b,c$ such that $b\oplus c=x_i$ (remember that here $b,c,x_i\in\mathbb Z_2^{\otimes n}$ are length-$n$ bit strings). Also, notice that for a given $b$ there is no more than one $c$ such that $b\oplus c=x_i$ (more precisely, there isn't any such $c$ if $x_i=0$, and there is exactly one if $x_i\neq 0$).

It follows that $\mathcal O_x$ is a (real) permutation matrix, and such matrices are always unitarily diagonalizable with unit eigenvalues (and therefore unitary). In this case, we have that the eigenvalues of $\mathcal O_x$ are $\pm1$, and the eigenvectors are, in the case $x_i\neq 0$, $$\lvert i\rangle\otimes(\lvert b\rangle\pm\lvert b\oplus x_i\rangle)$$ for all $i$ and $b$. If $x_i=0$ then $\mathcal O_x$ is the identity, and therefore its spectrum is trivial${}^\dagger$.

This shows explicitly that $\mathcal O_x$ is unitarily diagonalizable with unit eigenvalues, and therefore is unitary.


${}^\dagger$ I'm actually being a bit sloppy for the sake of simplicity here. This analysis holds for each different block of $\mathcal O_x$ corresponding to a given $i$. More precisely, I should say that $\mathcal O_x$ is block-diagonal as it doesn't connect spaces with $i\neq j$ on the first register, and each block is either the identity in the subspace in which it acts if $x_i=0$, or a permutation matrix that connects different pairs of basis states if $x_i\neq 0$.

glS

Posted 2019-03-26T12:11:16.280

Reputation: 12 247

8

Apply it twice: $$ O_xO_x|i\rangle|b\rangle=O_x|i\rangle|b\oplus x_i\rangle=|i\rangle|b\oplus x_i\oplus x_i\rangle=|i\rangle|b\rangle $$ Hence, $O_x$ is its own inverse, and therefore reversible.

To prove unitarity, it makes more sense to prove that $O_x$ has eigenvectors $$ |i\rangle(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)\quad\text{and}\quad|i\rangle(|0\rangle-|1\rangle) $$ for all $i$ with eigenvalues $1$ and $(-1)^{x_i}$ respectively. These are all orthonormal, and span the full Hilbert space. Consequently, the eigenvalues of $O_x$ are all $\pm 1$, and therefore $O_x^\star=O_x$ (where $^\star$ represents the Hermitian conjugate). Thus, $$ O_xO_x^\star=\mathbb{I}, $$ as required for a unitary.

DaftWullie

Posted 2019-03-26T12:11:16.280

Reputation: 35 722

Thanks, I now understand $O_{x}$ is its own inverse but how does that make it unitary? For a unitary matrix, one would need to show that its inverse is equal to its conjugate transpose, $MM^{*}=I$. I think we further need to show $O_{x}$ is Hermitian, then it will be done. – Divyat – 2019-03-26T13:56:06.413

One more doubt, I think the answer still assumes that $O_{x}$ is normal matrix, as then with real eigenvalues we can claim it to be Hermitian. Please tell whether it is okay to assume oracle as normal or some justifications for it? – Divyat – 2019-03-26T15:52:00.507

This explanation is not quite correct, because you assumed that $O_x$ is diagonalizable, but it is not follow from $O_x^2=I$. The thing is $O_x$ maps basis vectors to basis vectors. Since $O_x^2=I$ then $Q_x$ is a permutation of basis vectors. – Danylo Y – 2019-03-26T16:17:56.423

I actually asked some time ago on math.SE whether one can deduce that $\sqrt A$ is diagonalizable from the fact that $A$ is, see here. As far as I understood the answers, $A^2=I$ is not enough to imply that $A$ is unitarily diagonalizable, a counterexample being $\begin{pmatrix}\cos\theta & 2\sin\theta \ \sin\theta/2 & -\cos\theta\end{pmatrix}$, which is a square root of the identity, but not (unitarily) diagonalizable, and not unitary, even though its eigenvalues are $\pm 1$.

– glS – 2019-03-26T18:01:42.003

1Fair enough, I was being a bit glib, particularly initially with regards to the difference between reversible and unitary, because usually its the reversibility aspect people are interested in. – DaftWullie – 2019-03-27T08:44:52.117