Is there an economic philosophy that is dualistic?

1

In classical economics its obvious that the philosophical model followed is inspired by both physics in its reductionism and biology to a primary notion - that of self-interest. This self-interest manifests itself in competition. So we may as well take here competition as the basic notion.

Cooperation as in cartels, or in a trade union is explained as altruism is in biology by reference to competition. The members of the trade union for example may find that their best interests are served by cooperating. So here cooperation is explained in terms of self-interest or competition. That is they find that the best way to compete is by cooperating.

Is there an economic philosophy that takes both cooperation & competition to be irreducible to each other? An example of competition that can be explained in terms of cooperation is a game of poker the players must cooperate to play before the begin to compete. A company before it can trade must abide by laws and regulations or at least be seen to do so. That is it is cooperating with what one can say is government - that is the body or bodies that are concerned with enacting laws that hold over all society.

One could say that classical economic theory is monistic whereas I'm asking for a dualistic one. These are of course philosophical, theological & ethical terms - I do not know whether they have been used in the philosophy of economics before.

Mozibur Ullah

Posted 2013-05-15T17:46:04.400

Reputation: 1

I'm not well verses in the philosophical terms, but game theory distinguishes players (and strategies and payoffs). Does that count as dualism (or pluralism)? – None – 2013-05-15T18:53:22.653

I don't think so - but i don't know it in any depth to be certain. But I have the distinct feeling it has the same underlying assumptions as classical economics. I could well be wrong though. – Mozibur Ullah – 2013-05-15T19:02:15.953

OK, if not, then how about equilibrium selection in game theory? Many games have multiple equilibria and it requires refinement to pick one. But all refinements are arbitrary in some sense. – None – 2013-05-15T19:11:45.980

Possibly interesting: "Economic logic impinges on contemporary political theory through both economic reductionism and economic methodology applied to political decision making (through game theory). We argue that the sort of models used are based on mechanistic and linear methodologies that have now been found wanting in physics. We argue that complexity based self-organization methods are better suited to model the complexities of economy and polity and their interactions with the overall social system." http://www.academia.edu/556829/A_Dynamic_Systems_View_of_Economic_and_Political_Theory

– None – 2013-05-15T19:18:36.247

its the underlying philosophy that I'm interested in. I'm sure that you'll have equilibria of some kind in classical economics too. But out of curiousity what do you mean by refinements, its not a term I've heard of before in connection with game theory. – Mozibur Ullah – 2013-05-15T19:18:45.837

Have a look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solution_concept.

– None – 2013-05-15T19:20:05.350

yes, it looks like they're coming from the same angle. – Mozibur Ullah – 2013-05-15T19:20:37.890

looks like refinement is broadly speaking just a form of approximation to a true and unique solution. I think the choice of refinement is a bit of a red herring. – Mozibur Ullah – 2013-05-15T19:28:47.813

I fully agree. That's why I proposed that multiple equilibria (of the same unrefined kind) present some form of "pluralism". – None – 2013-05-15T19:34:50.783

yes, but they explicitly say in the article you refer to that this is an artifact of the approximation, and what they're doing is tending to a unique solution by refinement – Mozibur Ullah – 2013-05-15T19:44:45.100

Oh. I only read the abstract. :) – None – 2013-05-15T19:47:01.047

is usually best :) – Mozibur Ullah – 2013-05-15T19:50:14.700

There is plenty of cooperation in classical economics, and not just in game theoretic analyses. Think, for example, about how companies or (llegal) cartels work. AFAIK, competion is mainly the basis of markets, which are admittedly a central notion in economics but not the only one. I believe your question needs refinement. – Eric '3ToedSloth' – 2013-05-23T08:43:51.443

@Eric'3ToedSloth': Cartels are part of the market. Companies are participants in the market. Where else do you think companies work? How do you propose my question needs refinement? – Mozibur Ullah – 2013-05-24T12:13:14.927

Agents within cartels and companies are (at least partly) cooperating, not constantly competing with each other, in order to achieve a common goal. Economics describes and models both competitive and cooperative behavior in many places, yet your question seems to somehow presuppose that it only concerns competition. That's why I believe it needs to be made more precise, it is not clear what exactly you are asking. – Eric '3ToedSloth' – 2013-05-25T17:08:02.480

Answers

1

Economic philosophy is a branch of the Philosophy of Social Science that attempts to deal with epidemiological problems of what is truth and true representations of reality within the social world. The original objective of discovering natural laws was its primary objective with the secondary objective being to find the best theory known given our current understanding. Economics is interested in positive optimal issues and normative descriptive issues. Collaboration and competition are merely attempts to look at issues of delivering optimal solutions.

Michael Parker

Posted 2013-05-15T17:46:04.400

Reputation: 31

who would you say are the canonical authors in this discipline? – Mozibur Ullah – 2013-11-22T02:52:20.030