3

1

I believe that logic is infallible, mathematics is true and that an entirely mathematical description of the entire universe is possible.

Are these inconsistent with materialism and atheism? Can somebody help me reconcile these? My problems are as follows:

Does infallible logic even as a concept, imply the existence of God?

Is the truth and reality of mathematics inconsistent with materialism?

If an entirely mathematical description of the entire universe is possible, does that mean God exists?

EDIT:

Clarification of Question no. 1: If logic is infallible, does it mean that it is more than just a human created thing? That something in the real world makes possible the infallibility of logic? Does it have to originate from a being such as God?

Clarification of Question no. 2 and 3: If mathematics is real, it is more than a invention of mankind, ryt? Since it is such a brilliant describer of reality, does it have to originate from God?

1What do you mean by “logic is infallible”? Where does Gödel fit in? – Jim Garrison – 2018-04-25T06:32:20.220

1@JimGarrison Godel's theorems demonstrate the limitations of a formal axiomatic system of mathematics, right? Not limitations of logic itself? – BlowMaMind – 2018-04-25T07:00:50.510

Following Jim Garrisson, it seems to me that Gödel's incompleteness theorems already show that logic is not "infallible" (depending on what you mean by that). It was formulated in a specific system but seems to tell us more general things such that : 1) we can't have a perfect logical formalization of mathematics 2) a formal logical system can't show its own consistency. It also applies to other "logical formatting" and produce an inevitable lack of certainty. – Boris – 2018-04-25T08:54:13.523

Gödel is out. "The true reason for the incompleteness that is inherent in all formal systems of mathematics lies in the fact that the generation of higher and higher types can be continued into the transfinite whereas every formal system contains at most countably many." [Kurt Gödel: "Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I", Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38 (1931) p. 191] Since transfinity has been contradicted (see e.g.https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/51038/will-mcduck-go-bankrupt), there is no problem with Gödel.

– Wilhelm – 2018-04-25T09:08:48.243First off you would have to define what you mean by 'God'. That issue apart, I'd answer no to all three questions. Logic and mathematics do not support existence as an absolute. You might like to check 'Laws of Form' by George Spencer Brown or the mathematics of QM as described by Ulrich Mohrhoff. . – None – 2018-04-25T09:46:44.503

By "mathematics is true" you mean self-consistent or what? In fact we don't know if they are. Also, I do not see any connections between mathematical description of universe and god. Makes no sense as like "If universe exists, does that mean God exists?" – rus9384 – 2018-04-25T18:22:16.423

1@BlowMaMind Your comment is correct, the people talking about Gödel are incorrect and should be ignored. Gödel's theorems have absolutely nothing to do with the "fallibility" of logic. – Not_Here – 2018-04-25T18:53:47.020

Quick counter-question:

which god, out of the thousands that humans worship? Longer answer: Atheism isrejection of faith-based doctrine. Logic and mathematics are not faith-based doctrine. Logic and maths has nothing to do with either theism or atheism. – MichaelK – 2018-04-26T05:40:57.903