Do Vermeulen and van den Akker's ideas on so called "metamodernism" have anything to say on Eric Gans' ideas of "victimary thinking"?
The prefix 'meta' here refers not to some reflective stance or repeated rumination, but to Plato's metaxy, which intends a movement between opposite poles as well as beyond
In contrast to postmodernism, [Gans'] post-millennialism is distinguished by the rejection of victimary thinking and a turn to “non-victimary dialogue” that will “diminish […] the amount of resentment in the world.
I ask, just cos the phrases about post-millennialism, the sole ones I have encountered, quoted in the article, seem potentially problematic. As if we can reduce global ressentment by convincing the "victims" that their concerns can be negotiated away.