Assign the results from a Solve to variable(s)

56

29

I understand Mathematica can't assign the results of a Solve to the unknowns because there may be more than 1 solution. How can I assign the 4 values of following result to variables?

enter image description here

Solve[y^2 == 13 x + 17 && y == 193 x + 29, {x, y}]

stevenvh

Posted 2012-06-11T13:13:19.977

Reputation: 6 446

Could you elaborate on what you are trying to achieve? In principle you can use Replace (or Part) to assign the values to variables. – sebhofer – 2012-06-11T13:36:35.390

@sebhofer - I want to assign the first x value to a variable X1, then the y value to Y1, the other two to X2 and Y2. I just don't seem to get the hang of references yet. – stevenvh – 2012-06-11T13:40:56.700

Answers

34

You can do this :

s = Solve[y^2 == 13 x + 17 && y == 193 x + 29, {x, y}];
xx = s[[All, 1, 2]];
yy = s[[All, 2, 2]];

Now you can access solutions, this way xx[[1]], yy[[2]].

If you prefer to collect solutions in Array, there is another way :

X = Array[ x, {Length@s}];
Y = Array[ y, {Length@s}];
x[k_] /; MemberQ[ Range[ Length @ s], k] := s[[k, 1, 2]]
y[k_] /; MemberQ[ Range[ Length @ s], k] := s[[k, 2, 2]]

now X is equivalent to s[[All, 1, 2]], while Y to s[[All, 2, 2]], e.g. :

X[[1]] == x[1]
Y == s[[All, 2, 2]]
True
True

You do not have to use or even to define X and Y arrays, e.g.

{x[1], y[1]}
{(-11181 - Sqrt[2242057])/74498, 1/386 (13 - Sqrt[2242057])}

We've used Condition i.e. /; to assure definitions of x[i], y[i] only for i in an appropriate range determined by Length @ s, i.e. number of solutions.

Artes

Posted 2012-06-11T13:13:19.977

Reputation: 51 831

4I think the OP is a complete beginner, and all he's looking for is ReplaceAll. This might be a bit too advanced for someone new to Mma. – Szabolcs – 2012-06-11T13:57:47.110

@Szabolcs Literally there is the assignment tag, so he is rather looking for Set or SetDelayed applications. – Artes – 2012-06-11T16:07:27.077

I think I'll use your first solution for now, until I get the hang of ReplaceAll. @Szabolcs: Yes, Mma virgin. Thanks, all. – stevenvh – 2012-06-12T07:09:25.413

@stevenvh I think this answer can be also interesting for you : http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/arithmetic-operation-on-the-value-returned-by-solve/8223#8223

– Artes – 2012-07-12T11:17:59.100

@Artes: could you tell me how can I find more information about the function s[[All, 1, 2]]? – anhnha – 2017-09-21T03:13:35.610

1@anhnha That's all information you can get, unless you've defined s in a different way, however one can use FullForm[s]. – Artes – 2017-09-21T05:06:08.200

@Artes: What is the meaning of "All, 1, 2" in that function? – anhnha – 2017-09-21T05:42:02.700

1@anhnha Read the doccumentation pages of Part then you'll understand what such a notation as [[i,j,k]] mean. – Artes – 2017-09-21T06:55:18.390

40

Usually you don't want to actually assign values to x and y, and you would use replacement rules instead:

sols = Solve[y^2 == 13 x + 17 && y == 193 x + 29, {x, y}];

{x, y} /. sols[[1]]

or for the second solution:

{x, y} /. sols[[2]]

If you really want to assign values to x and y globally, you could use:

Set @@@ sols[[1]]

but you must clear x and y before using another set:

Clear[x, y]
Set @@@ sols[[2]]

If you want to assign values to x and y within a Block you could do something like this:

Hold @@ {sols[[2]]} /. Rule -> Set /. _[vars_] :>
  Block[vars,
   Sin[x] + Sqrt[y] // N
  ]

This uses what I am calling the injector pattern to get the values into Block in the right syntax without it prematurely evaluating.


Related questions:

Getting rid of the “x ->” in FindInstance results

Using the output of Solve

Mr.Wizard

Posted 2012-06-11T13:13:19.977

Reputation: 259 163

1

+1.Something related to your last comment and the injector pattern.

– Leonid Shifrin – 2012-06-11T14:05:04.137

I agree that often you just want to use rules, but in my case I'm trying to set a global variable before going on to solve for other things (where Solve will work better if it has this global value instead of trying to remain general for all possible values). I tried the equivalent of Set[sols[[1]]], and when that didn't work. Of course the "help" file is no help because it insists on explaining the symbol = and not the function Set, so I ended up here. What is Set @@@ sols[[1]] doing? – Travis Bemrose – 2016-02-21T22:39:48.590

@Travis Assuming you want this in my own words please reference (46248). @@@ is shorthand for Apply at levelspec {1}. So foo @@@ {x -> val1, y -> val2} becomes {foo[x, val1], foo[y, val2]}, or in the code in the question {Set[x, val1], Set[y, val2]}, which then assigns the values with Set. (= is the shorthand for Set.)

– Mr.Wizard – 2016-02-22T04:38:25.173

I understand that Set and = are equivalent, but it's the Set[x, val] that the help file wouldn't tell me. I'm not sure what levelspec is, but I see that @@@ is grabbing stuff from either side of ->. I'm guessing there's some Func[x, val] equivalent to x -> val so that @@@ replaces Func with Set? – Travis Bemrose – 2016-02-22T11:05:19.410

1@Travis Okay. You need to become familiar with the long form of all these "shorthand" operators. You can see the long form by wrapping code in HoldForm[FullForm[ code ]] -- for example HoldForm[FullForm[ {x -> val1, y = val2} ]] will reveal List[Rule[x, val1], Set[y, val2]]. This "FullForm" expression is what you need to visualize when you think about Mathematica manipulating code. Virtually all Replace, Map, Apply, Part, etc. operations effectively "see" this structure, not the short form you type in. See e.g. HoldForm[FullForm[ a - b ]] – Mr.Wizard – 2016-02-22T16:45:06.853

@Mr.Wizard Your comments have been very helpful, and I keep coming back here to relearn "what function was that, that showed me the structure?" I've been searching levelspec, but I only find references to it, and to tutorials on it directly. I have questions such as "Does the index start counting at 0 or 1? Does it count up or down? Is it relative or absolute?" --- Do you know a good tutorial or reference you can point me and others to? – Travis Bemrose – 2016-03-08T06:27:28.683

1

@Travis the canonical Q&A here is (15567), and I suggest you also look at the links in my answer to (29750). If these do not answer all your questions please let me know.

– Mr.Wizard – 2016-03-08T12:45:36.077

21

Update: Version 10 built-in function Values does value extraction conveniently for rules appearing in lists of arbitrary lengths and depths:

{{x1, y1}, {x2, y2}} = Values[Solve[y^2 == 13 x + 17 && y == 193 x + 29, {x, y}]]
(* {{(-11181-Sqrt[2242057])/74498,1/386 (13-Sqrt[2242057])}, 
    {(-11181+Sqrt[2242057])/74498,1/386 (13+Sqrt[2242057])}} *)

Another example:

lst={{a->1,b->2},{c->3},{{d->4}},{e->5,{f->6,{g->7}}}};
Values[lst]
(* {{1,2},{3},{{4}},{5,{6,{7}}}} *)

Original post:

{{x1, y1}, {x2, y2}} = Solve[y^2 == 13 x + 17 && y == 193 x + 29, {x, y}][[All, All, -1]]
(* {{(-11181 - Sqrt[2242057])/74498, 1/386 (13 - Sqrt[2242057])}, 
    {(-11181 + Sqrt[2242057])/74498, 1/386 (13 + Sqrt[2242057])}} *)

{x1, y2}
(* {(-11181- Sqrt[2242057]) / 74498, 1 / 386 (13 + Sqrt[2242057])} *)

kglr

Posted 2012-06-11T13:13:19.977

Reputation: 302 076

I'm sorry you've deleted your previous answer nevertheless suppresing duplicates we reduce increasing overall entropy of this site, +1. – Artes – 2014-09-19T21:07:05.020

@artes, thank you for the upvote. I agree with your concern over excessive duplicates. The other Q/A is indeed a special case of this one. However, because of its special structure, some tricks that work there do not work here, e.g Last@@@Solve[...]. – kglr – 2014-09-19T21:16:29.187

10

If you really wish to assign solutions to variables, you can do something like this:

In[1]:= ClearAll[Subscript]
sols=Solve[y^2==13x+17&&y==193x+29,{x,y}];
i=0;
sols/.{r__Rule}:>Set@@@({r}/.var:x|y->Subscript[var,++i]);
Subscript//Definition

Out[5]=

Subscript[x,1]=(-11181-Sqrt[2242057])/74498
Subscript[x,2]=(-11181+Sqrt[2242057])/74498
Subscript[y,1]=1/386(13-Sqrt[2242057])
Subscript[y,2]=1/386 (13+Sqrt[2242057])

Then you can use the solutions for demonstration purposes:

enter image description here

Alexey Popkov

Posted 2012-06-11T13:13:19.977

Reputation: 50 220

7

Here's a painless solution:

s = Solve[y^2 == 13 x + 17 && y == 193 x + 29, {x, y}];

Assign the four results of the solution s above to a variable each, in sequence

{X1, Y1, X2, Y2} = s // Values // Flatten;

Verify

{X1, Y1, X2, Y2}
{(-11181 - Sqrt[2242057])/74498, 1/386 (13 - Sqrt[2242057]), 
 (-11181 + Sqrt[2242057])/74498, 1/386 (13 + Sqrt[2242057])}

Vixillator

Posted 2012-06-11T13:13:19.977

Reputation: 814

5

Ah, they finally implemented it in version 10, then! Here's a procedure I've been using since version 5, it might provide similar features in versions prior to the introduction of Value. (I'm not sure, but maybe I posted it on the MathGroup... so forgive me if this is not news)

I had called it "ToValues". I gave it two options:

Options[ToValues] = {
      Flattening -> Automatic, IndexedFunction -> False};

The help message is hopefully self-explicating:

ToValues::usage =
    "ToValues[li] 
    suppresses the Rule wrapper in every part of list li.\n ToValues[li,F] \
applies the function F to every rhs of Rule, turning var->value into \
F[value]. If the function F has a parametrized head, then it is possible to \
pass the lhs of Rule to it by setting the option IndexedFunction->True. It will \
turn var->value into F[var][value].\n When the option Flattening is set to \
Automatic, ToValues flattens li to yield a simplified structure (the \
flattening is tuned to get the simplest list of values for the solution of a \
system of several equation in several variables). With Flattening set to None \
the original structure is left intact.";

The code is really short.

ToValues[li_, opts___Rule] := Module[
    {newli, vars, sols, fl},
    fl = Flattening /. {opts} /. Options[ToValues];
    sols = First[Dimensions[li]]; vars = Last[Dimensions[li]];
    newli = li /. Rule[_, v_] -> v;
    If[fl == Automatic && vars == 1, newli = Flatten[newli]];
    If[fl == Automatic && sols == 1, First[newli], newli]
    ]

ToValues[li_, fun_, opts___Rule] := 
  Module[
    {newli, vars, sols, foo, fl, mi},
    mi = IndexedFunction /. {opts} /. Options[ToValues];
    fl = Flattening /. {opts} /. Options[ToValues];
    If[mi == True,
          newli = li /. (x_ -> v_) -> foo[x][v],
          newli = li /. (_ -> v_) -> foo[v]
      ];
    sols = First[Dimensions[li]]; vars = Last[Dimensions[li]];
    If[fl == Automatic && vars == 1, newli = Flatten[newli]];
    If[fl == Automatic && sols == 1, First[newli], newli] //. foo -> fun
]

Example data:

sols = {{x -> 1}, {y -> 2}, {z -> 3}};

Application of ToValues to lists of rules produces a list of values

ToValues[sols] // InputForm

{1, 2, 3}

Of course assignment is immediate, here

{x1,x2,x3} = ToValues[sols]

By default, ToValues returns the simplest list of values possible, suppressing nested list. If you want to preserve the original nesting, this is what the Flattening option does:

ToValues[sols, Flattening -> None] // InputForm

{{1}, {2}, {3}}

We can specify a function to be applied to the returned values.

ToValues[sols, F] // InputForm

{F[1], F[2], F[3]}

We can also use function that make use of the right hand sides of the rules. Just define them as functions with a parametrized Head and set IndexedFunction->True to instruct ToValues to make use of that. In this case we want to return lists in the form {variable name, variable value}:

F[var_][value_] := {var, value}

ToValues[sols, F, IndexedFunction -> True] // InputForm

{{x, 1}, {y, 2}, {z, 3}}

ToValues[sols, F, IndexedFunction -> True, Flattening -> None] // InputForm

{{{x, 1}}, {{y, 2}}, {{z, 3}}}

Real world applications

ToValues is normally used to extract solutions from the lists returned by Solve, NSolve, DSolve, etc. In its default form it can be applied in this way:

Solve[{x + y == 1, x - y == 2}] // ToValues

{3/2, 1/2}

This gives a list of the complex solutions

Solve[x^5 == 1] // ToValues

This uses the optional function to compute the real and imaginary part of each solution

coords = ToValues[Solve[x^5 == 1, x], {Re[#], Im[#]} &] // N;
ListPlot[coords, AspectRatio -> Automatic, Frame -> True, 
   PlotStyle -> PointSize[.018]];

And this pushes the function to create graphics objects (Points) based on those values inside ToValues:

pts = ToValues[Solve[x^9 == 1, x], Point[{Re[#], Im[#]}] &];
Show[Graphics[{PointSize[.018], pts}],
    AspectRatio -> 1, Frame -> True, Axes -> True];

Someone who has patience enough might want to add the plots.

Peltio

Posted 2012-06-11T13:13:19.977

Reputation: 5 206

1

Here is an easy solution

s = Solve[y^2 == 13 x + 17 && y == 193 x + 29, {x, y}];
x1 = x /. s[[1, 1]];
y1 = y /. s[[1, 2]];
x2 = x /. s[[2, 1]];
y2 = y /. s[[2, 2]];

We can verify with

MatrixForm[{{x1, y1}, {x2, y2}}]

The output looks like

assign

For reference, please look at assign.

zyy

Posted 2012-06-11T13:13:19.977

Reputation: 185

1Correct but seems to duplicate parts of earlier answers. – bbgodfrey – 2018-06-08T21:44:46.647

Also requires knowing the structure of the solution set. The outcome should not depend on whether Solveorders y results before or after x. Here it does though, and that's not good at all. – Daniel Lichtblau – 2018-06-08T23:26:14.030

It is different, I used replacement with variables instead of direct assignment. – zyy – 2018-06-09T17:03:21.717

As for requirement of knowing the structure, you have to know the structure before you do the assignment, as Mathematica is not showing the solutions in a particular order, which is a pain for me as well. – zyy – 2018-06-09T17:05:59.690