Would 3d-printed objects outgas in vacuum?


I want to fabricate a sample holder and shadow masks to use in vacuum chambers. The type of printing material is not important to me PLA/ABS/PC-ABS/nylon).

I'm worried that 3d printed objects (FDM) would degas under high vacuum. Is that an actual concern?


Posted 2016-01-12T22:10:12.917

Reputation: 323


Also, some fo those are 3D printable https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materials_for_use_in_vacuum#Plastics

– hroncok – 2016-01-12T22:58:56.580

I am voting to close this question as "unclear what you're asking" because the author refuses to specify what material and printing process are used. – Tom van der Zanden – 2016-01-14T06:53:56.103

1@TomvanderZanden "refuses"?? – Sparkler – 2016-01-14T13:10:02.397

Perhaps "refuses" was not a good choice of words, but "I don't care" is a bit odd. The question doesn't even specify what process (FDM,SLS,...) would be used to make the prints even though process and material could both be important factors. – Tom van der Zanden – 2016-01-14T13:13:56.453

1@TomvanderZanden question updated – Sparkler – 2016-01-14T13:22:26.607

3Disclaimer: I don't work for these guys. Take a look at MadeInSpace's 3D printer and materials... They spent a while getting a printer ready for use on the ISS and I know they spent time worrying about outgassing concerns. You might even be able to contact them directly to ask how they solved the problem. – PostEpoch – 2016-01-16T19:04:39.903

What material do you want to print? – the third dimension – 2016-01-12T22:16:41.417

4Would it hurt to just try it and see? That would definitely be an interesting experiment. If you ever test it, you should post some of the information on this post. – tbm0115 – 2016-01-12T22:19:30.487

1@thethirddimension abs, pla, I don't care. – Sparkler – 2016-01-12T22:22:00.237

@tbm0115 I don't want to risk it when expensive equipment is involved. – Sparkler – 2016-01-12T22:23:03.423

you don't care if its either of the two or you don't care at all? – the third dimension – 2016-01-12T22:25:34.107

Would it be possible to assume that if the print survives 2 atm, it would survive a vacuum? – Eric Johnson – 2016-01-12T22:28:46.070

1@thethirddimension don't care at all, as long as it's not esoteric – Sparkler – 2016-01-12T22:38:29.130

@Sparkler that's understandable. Too bad though lol – tbm0115 – 2016-01-12T22:39:22.077

What kind of vacuum are you running? I have turbo-pumps that can get to 1e-7 torr and lots of small 3D printed parts... I have always suspected there would be pretty awful outgassing so we tend to use 3D printed parts on the outside of our vacuum chambers... – Kevin Morse – 2016-01-12T22:52:25.950



I found much the same question at Does PLA outgas? An answer there pointed to a NASA outgassing database, Outgassing Data for Selecting Spacecraft Materials, and says that:

ABS (unknown supplier), MakerGeeks PET and Makerbot PLA have been measured and are listed in the NASA database.

Poster there recommended PLA for lower outgassing, and clear PLA because there would be fewer additives to complicate the problem.


Posted 2016-01-12T22:10:12.917

Reputation: 3 081

0.56% total mass lost and 0.01% collected volatile condensable materials. Neat! So the practical answer is that PLA can be used in a vacuum. – Navin – 2019-09-17T14:54:09.007


Almost all of the FDM materials outgas even at normal atmospheric pressure, and, in fact, most plastics outgas. Further, FDM and many other printing processes do not guarantee no internal voids - meaning that putting a 3D printed object into a vacuum may result in breakage, cracking, and possible explosion hazards.

For this reason I would focus only on SLA, as the model is printed within the liquid resin pool and should have a reduced possibility of internal voids.

Finding a resin that has a low out-gas rate after curing, though, is still going to be difficult.

For this to be answered more completely, you need to specify your tolerable outgassing rate, and the processes used inside the vacuum chamber. For instance the answer would be completely different if you are discussing an electron microscope vs a sputtering chamber. As a start you might consider companies that specialize in engineered materials intended for vacuum use. They may be able to provide guidance as to which of their materials might be 3D printed and usable in your setup.

Adam Davis

Posted 2016-01-12T22:10:12.917

Reputation: 1 793

I agree, and also want to bring your 3D design to mind. If you have airpockets in your model, without explosion, you might create an artificial leak in your vacuum chamber. I am not aware if air pockets (however small they might be) are completely avoidable in FDM in general (I also guess this is what Adam says in the second paragraph). – kamuro – 2016-06-09T07:02:52.127


This naturally depends on the ultimate pressure you require. I have made a few tests with LEGO pieces (ABS) in vacuum and reached 10-5 mbar without problems. I did not try to go any lower.

Otherwise, have a look here: A 3D printed beam splitter for polar neutral molecules.

A Formlabs Stereolithography machine was used there, producing a material that basically is PMMA. Pressures in the 10-8 mbar range are possible with that. Recently, Formlabs has presented a resin that produces heatable plastic up to 280°C, and that can be baked to get into the 10-10 mbar range (tested here).


Posted 2016-01-12T22:10:12.917

Reputation: 51

1Are you missing a link? (tested here) – tjb1 – 2017-02-02T13:03:07.337

You must have a really nice vacuum pump.... – TextGeek – 2017-02-06T15:04:32.503


At work, I put a 3d ABS part printed via 3d hubs (5*20*30), in the chamber at 1 mbar. No signs of breakage what so ever. No signs of sudden leaks.

Going anywhere below 1mbar, i.e., to 10^-infinity mbar, I think should theoretically still not cause any breakage or sudden leaks, as the expected mechanism of failure depends on the pressure difference; i.e., [1atm-1mbar] ~=[1atm-10^-infinity mbar].

Based on the above I have made some more parts to be put in a chamber at 1E-5 mbar.

Pandian Le

Posted 2016-01-12T22:10:12.917

Reputation: 121