Binomial coefficient
In mathematics, any of the positive integers that occurs as a coefficient in the binomial theorem is a binomial coefficient. Commonly, a binomial coefficient is indexed by a pair of integers n ≥ k ≥ 0 and is written It is the coefficient of the x^{k} term in the polynomial expansion of the binomial power (1 + x)^{n}, and it is given by the formula
For example:
where , etc.
Arranging the numbers in successive rows for gives a triangular array called Pascal's triangle, satisfying the recurrence relation .
The binomial coefficients occur in many areas of mathematics, especially combinatorics. The symbol is usually read as "n choose k" because there are ways to choose an (unordered) subset of k elements from a fixed set of n elements. For example, there are ways to choose 2 elements from , namely , , , , , .
Many properties of also apply to the generalized binomial coefficients for any complex number z and integer k ≥ 0.
History and notation
Andreas von Ettingshausen introduced the notation in 1826,^{[1]} although the numbers were known centuries earlier (see Pascal's triangle). The earliest known detailed discussion of binomial coefficients is in a tenthcentury commentary, by Halayudha, on an ancient Sanskrit text, Pingala's Chandaḥśāstra. In about 1150, the Indian mathematician Bhaskaracharya gave an exposition of binomial coefficients in his book Līlāvatī.^{[2]}
Alternative notations include C(n, k), _{n}C_{k}, ^{n}C_{k}, C^{k}_{n}, C^{n}_{k}, and C_{n,k} in all of which the C stands for combinations or choices. Many calculators use variants of the C notation because they can represent it on a singleline display. In this form the binomial coefficients are easily compared to kpermutations of n, written as P(n, k), etc.
Definition and interpretations
For natural numbers (taken to include 0) n and k, the binomial coefficient can be defined as the coefficient of the monomial X^{k} in the expansion of (1 + X)^{n}. The same coefficient also occurs (if k ≤ n) in the binomial formula

(∗)
(valid for any elements x,y of a commutative ring), which explains the name "binomial coefficient".
Another occurrence of this number is in combinatorics, where it gives the number of ways, disregarding order, that k objects can be chosen from among n objects; more formally, the number of kelement subsets (or kcombinations) of an nelement set. This number can be seen as equal to the one of the first definition, independently of any of the formulas below to compute it: if in each of the n factors of the power (1 + X)^{n} one temporarily labels the term X with an index i (running from 1 to n), then each subset of k indices gives after expansion a contribution X^{k}, and the coefficient of that monomial in the result will be the number of such subsets. This shows in particular that is a natural number for any natural numbers n and k. There are many other combinatorial interpretations of binomial coefficients (counting problems for which the answer is given by a binomial coefficient expression), for instance the number of words formed of n bits (digits 0 or 1) whose sum is k is given by , while the number of ways to write where every a_{i} is a nonnegative integer is given by . Most of these interpretations are easily seen to be equivalent to counting kcombinations.
Computing the value of binomial coefficients
Several methods exist to compute the value of without actually expanding a binomial power or counting kcombinations.
Recursive formula
One method uses the recursive, purely additive, formula
with initial/boundary values
The formula follows from considering the set {1,2,3,…,n} and counting separately (a) the kelement groupings that include a particular set element, say "i", in every group (since "i" is already chosen to fill one spot in every group, we need only choose k − 1 from the remaining n − 1) and (b) all the kgroupings that don't include "i"; this enumerates all the possible kcombinations of n elements. It also follows from tracing the contributions to X^{k} in (1 + X)^{n−1}(1 + X). As there is zero X^{n+1} or X^{−1} in (1 + X)^{n}, one might extend the definition beyond the above boundaries to include = 0 when either k > n or k < 0. This recursive formula then allows the construction of Pascal's triangle, surrounded by white spaces where the zeros, or the trivial coefficients, would be.
Multiplicative formula
A more efficient method to compute individual binomial coefficients is given by the formula
where the numerator of the first fraction is expressed as a falling factorial power. This formula is easiest to understand for the combinatorial interpretation of binomial coefficients. The numerator gives the number of ways to select a sequence of k distinct objects, retaining the order of selection, from a set of n objects. The denominator counts the number of distinct sequences that define the same kcombination when order is disregarded.
Due to the symmetry of the binomial coefficient with regard to k and n−k, calculation may be optimised by setting the upper limit of the product above to the smaller of k and n−k.
Factorial formula
Finally, though computationally unsuitable, there is the compact form, often used in proofs and derivations, which makes repeated use of the familiar factorial function:
where n! denotes the factorial of n. This formula follows from the multiplicative formula above by multiplying numerator and denominator by (n − k)!; as a consequence it involves many factors common to numerator and denominator. It is less practical for explicit computation (in the case that k is small and n is large) unless common factors are first cancelled (in particular since factorial values grow very rapidly). The formula does exhibit a symmetry that is less evident from the multiplicative formula (though it is from the definitions)

(1)
which leads to a more efficient multiplicative computational routine. Using the falling factorial notation,
Generalization and connection to the binomial series
The multiplicative formula allows the definition of binomial coefficients to be extended^{[3]} by replacing n by an arbitrary number α (negative, real, complex) or even an element of any commutative ring in which all positive integers are invertible:
With this definition one has a generalization of the binomial formula (with one of the variables set to 1), which justifies still calling the binomial coefficients:

(2)
This formula is valid for all complex numbers α and X with X < 1. It can also be interpreted as an identity of formal power series in X, where it actually can serve as definition of arbitrary powers of power series with constant coefficient equal to 1; the point is that with this definition all identities hold that one expects for exponentiation, notably
If α is a nonnegative integer n, then all terms with k > n are zero, and the infinite series becomes a finite sum, thereby recovering the binomial formula. However, for other values of α, including negative integers and rational numbers, the series is really infinite.
Pascal's triangle
Pascal's rule is the important recurrence relation

(3)
which can be used to prove by mathematical induction that is a natural number for all n and k, a fact that is not immediately obvious from formula (1).
Pascal's rule also gives rise to Pascal's triangle:
0: 1 1: 1 1 2: 1 2 1 3: 1 3 3 1 4: 1 4 6 4 1 5: 1 5 10 10 5 1 6: 1 6 15 20 15 6 1 7: 1 7 21 35 35 21 7 1 8: 1 8 28 56 70 56 28 8 1
Row number n contains the numbers for k = 0,…,n. It is constructed by starting with ones at the outside and then always adding two adjacent numbers and writing the sum directly underneath. This method allows the quick calculation of binomial coefficients without the need for fractions or multiplications. For instance, by looking at row number 5 of the triangle, one can quickly read off that
 (x + y)^{5} = 1 x^{5} + 5 x^{4}y + 10 x^{3}y^{2} + 10 x^{2}y^{3} + 5 x y^{4} + 1 y^{5}.
The differences between elements on other diagonals are the elements in the previous diagonal, as a consequence of the recurrence relation (3) above.
Combinatorics and statistics
Binomial coefficients are of importance in combinatorics, because they provide ready formulas for certain frequent counting problems:
 There are ways to choose k elements from a set of n elements. See Combination.
 There are ways to choose k elements from a set of n elements if repetitions are allowed. See Multiset.
 There are strings containing k ones and n zeros.
 There are strings consisting of k ones and n zeros such that no two ones are adjacent.^{[4]}
 The Catalan numbers are
 The binomial distribution in statistics is
Binomial coefficients as polynomials
For any nonnegative integer k, the expression can be simplified and defined as a polynomial divided by k!:
this presents a polynomial in t with rational coefficients.
As such, it can be evaluated at any real or complex number t to define binomial coefficients with such first arguments. These "generalized binomial coefficients" appear in Newton's generalized binomial theorem.
For each k, the polynomial can be characterized as the unique degree k polynomial p(t) satisfying p(0) = p(1) = ... = p(k − 1) = 0 and p(k) = 1.
Its coefficients are expressible in terms of Stirling numbers of the first kind:
The derivative of can be calculated by logarithmic differentiation:
Binomial coefficients as a basis for the space of polynomials
Over any field of characteristic 0 (that is, any field that contains the rational numbers), each polynomial p(t) of degree at most d is uniquely expressible as a linear combination of binomial coefficients. The coefficient a_{k} is the kth difference of the sequence p(0), p(1), …, p(k). Explicitly,^{[5]}

(4)
Integervalued polynomials
Each polynomial is integervalued: it has an integer value at all integer inputs . (One way to prove this is by induction on k, using Pascal's identity.) Therefore, any integer linear combination of binomial coefficient polynomials is integervalued too. Conversely, (4) shows that any integervalued polynomial is an integer linear combination of these binomial coefficient polynomials. More generally, for any subring R of a characteristic 0 field K, a polynomial in K[t] takes values in R at all integers if and only if it is an Rlinear combination of binomial coefficient polynomials.
Example
The integervalued polynomial 3t(3t + 1)/2 can be rewritten as
Identities involving binomial coefficients
The factorial formula facilitates relating nearby binomial coefficients. For instance, if k is a positive integer and n is arbitrary, then

(5)
and, with a little more work,
Moreover, the following may be useful:
For constant n, we have the following recurrence:
Sums of the binomial coefficients
The formula

(∗∗)
says the elements in the n^{th} row of Pascal's triangle always add up to 2 raised to the n^{th} power. This is obtained from the binomial theorem (∗) by setting x = 1 and y = 1. The formula also has a natural combinatorial interpretation: the left side sums the number of subsets of {1,...,n} of sizes k = 0,1,...,n, giving the total number of subsets. (That is, the left side counts the power set of {1,...,n}.) However, these subsets can also be generated by successively choosing or excluding each element 1,...,n; the n independent binary choices (bitstrings) allow a total of choices. The left and right sides are two ways to count the same collection of subsets, so they are equal.
The formulas

(6)
and follow from (2) after differentiating with respect to x (twice in the latter) and then substituting x = 1.
The Chu–Vandermonde identity, which holds for any complexvalues m and n and any nonnegative integer k, is

(7)
and can be found by examination of the coefficient of in the expansion of (1 + x)^{m} (1 + x)^{n − m} = (1 + x)^{n} using equation (2). When m = 1, equation (7) reduces to equation (3). In the special case n = 2m, k = m, using (1), the expansion (7) becomes (as seen in Pascal's triangle at right)

(8)
where the term on the right side is a central binomial coefficient.
Another form of the Chu–Vandermonde identity, which applies for any integers j, k, and n satisfying 0 ≤ j ≤ k ≤ n, is

(9)
The proof is similar, but uses the binomial series expansion (2) with negative integer exponents. When j = k, equation (9) gives the hockeystick identity
Let F(n) denote the nth Fibonacci number. Then
This can be proved by induction using (3) or by Zeckendorf's representation. A combinatorial proof is given below.
Multisections of sums
For integers s and t such that , series multisection gives the following identity for the sum of binomial coefficients:
For small s, these series have particularly nice forms; for example,^{[6]}
Partial sums
Although there is no closed formula for partial sums
of binomial coefficients,^{[7]} one can again use (3) and induction to show that for k = 0, ..., n − 1,
 ,
with special case^{[8]}
for n > 0. This latter result is also a special case of the result from the theory of finite differences that for any polynomial P(x) of degree less than n,^{[9]}
Differentiating (2) k times and setting x = −1 yields this for , when 0 ≤ k < n, and the general case follows by taking linear combinations of these.
When P(x) is of degree less than or equal to n,

(10)
where is the coefficient of degree n in P(x).
More generally for (10),
where m and d are complex numbers. This follows immediately applying (10) to the polynomial Q(x):=P(m + dx) instead of P(x), and observing that Q(x) has still degree less than or equal to n, and that its coefficient of degree n is d^{n}a_{n}.
The series is convergent for k ≥ 2. This formula is used in the analysis of the German tank problem. It follows from which is proved by induction on M.
Identities with combinatorial proofs
Many identities involving binomial coefficients can be proved by combinatorial means. For example, for nonnegative integers , the identity
(which reduces to (6) when q = 1) can be given a double counting proof, as follows. The left side counts the number of ways of selecting a subset of [n] = {1, 2, …, n} with at least q elements, and marking q elements among those selected. The right side counts the same thing, because there are ways of choosing a set of q elements to mark, and to choose which of the remaining elements of [n] also belong to the subset.
In Pascal's identity
both sides count the number of kelement subsets of [n]: the two terms on the right side group them into those that contain element n and those that do not.
The identity (8) also has a combinatorial proof. The identity reads
Suppose you have empty squares arranged in a row and you want to mark (select) n of them. There are ways to do this. On the other hand, you may select your n squares by selecting k squares from among the first n and squares from the remaining n squares; any k from 0 to n will work. This gives
Now apply (5) to get the result.
If one denotes by F(i) the sequence of Fibonacci numbers, indexed so that F(0) = F(1) = 1, then the identity
has the following combinatorial proof.^{[10]} One may show by induction that F(n) counts the number of ways that a n × 1 strip of squares may be covered by 2 × 1 and 1 × 1 tiles. On the other hand, if such a tiling uses exactly k of the 2 × 1 tiles, then it uses n − 2k of the 1 × 1 tiles, and so uses n − k tiles total. There are ways to order these tiles, and so summing this coefficient over all possible values of k gives the identity.
Sum of coefficients row
The number of kcombinations for all k, , is the sum of the nth row (counting from 0) of the binomial coefficients. These combinations are enumerated by the 1 digits of the set of base 2 numbers counting from 0 to , where each digit position is an item from the set of n.
Dixon's identity
or, more generally,
where a, b, and c are nonnegative integers.
Continuous identities
Certain trigonometric integrals have values expressible in terms of binomial coefficients:
For
These can be proved by using Euler's formula to convert trigonometric functions to complex exponentials, expanding using the binomial theorem, and integrating term by term.
Generating functions
Ordinary generating functions
For a fixed n, the ordinary generating function of the sequence is:
For a fixed k, the ordinary generating function of the sequence is:
The bivariate generating function of the binomial coefficients is:
Another bivariate generating function of the binomial coefficients, which is symmetric, is:
Exponential generating function
A symmetric exponential bivariate generating function of the binomial coefficients is:
Divisibility properties
In 1852, Kummer proved that if m and n are nonnegative integers and p is a prime number, then the largest power of p dividing equals p^{c}, where c is the number of carries when m and n are added in base p. Equivalently, the exponent of a prime p in equals the number of nonnegative integers j such that the fractional part of k/p^{j} is greater than the fractional part of n/p^{j}. It can be deduced from this that is divisible by n/gcd(n,k). In particular therefore it follows that p divides for all positive integers r and s such that s < p^{r}. However this is not true of higher powers of p: for example 9 does not divide .
A somewhat surprising result by David Singmaster (1974) is that any integer divides almost all binomial coefficients. More precisely, fix an integer d and let f(N) denote the number of binomial coefficients with n < N such that d divides . Then
Since the number of binomial coefficients with n < N is N(N + 1) / 2, this implies that the density of binomial coefficients divisible by d goes to 1.
Binomial coefficients have divisibility properties related to least common multiples of consecutive integers. For example:^{[11]}
divides .
is a multiple of .
Another fact: An integer n ≥ 2 is prime if and only if all the intermediate binomial coefficients
are divisible by n.
Proof: When p is prime, p divides
 for all 0 < k < p
because is a natural number and p divides the numerator but not the denominator. When n is composite, let p be the smallest prime factor of n and let k = n/p. Then 0 < p < n and
otherwise the numerator k(n − 1)(n − 2)×...×(n − p + 1) has to be divisible by n = k×p, this can only be the case when (n − 1)(n − 2)×...×(n − p + 1) is divisible by p. But n is divisible by p, so p does not divide n − 1, n − 2, ..., n − p + 1 and because p is prime, we know that p does not divide (n − 1)(n − 2)×...×(n − p + 1) and so the numerator cannot be divisible by n.
Bounds and asymptotic formulas
The following bounds for hold for all values of n and k such that 1 ≤ k ≤ n:
 .
The first inequality follows from the fact that and each of these terms in this product is . A similar argument can be made to show . The final strict inequality follows from multiplying by the Taylor series for .
From the divisibility properties we can infer that
 ,
where both equalities can be achieved.^{[12]}
Stirling's approximation yields the following approximation, when are sufficiently large:
In particular, when is sufficiently large:
Also:
 and, in general, for m ≥ 2 and n ≥ 1,
For and both much larger than 1, Stirling's approximation also yields the following asymptotic approximation:
where is the binary entropy of . More precisely, for all integers with , we can estimate the sum of the first binomial coefficients as follows:^{[13]}
When is large and is much smaller than , one can also write
and therefore
If more precision is desired, one can approximate with an integral, obtaining
For and , , and these approximations yield 12.312 and 12.133 respectively.
The infinite product formula (cf. Gamma function, alternative definition)
yields the asymptotic formulas
as .
This asymptotic behaviour is contained in the approximation
as well. (Here is the kth harmonic number and is the Euler–Mascheroni constant.)
Further, the asymptotic formula
hold true, whenever and for some complex number .
A simple and rough upper bound for the sum of binomial coefficients can be obtained using the binomial theorem:
If n is large and k is linear in n, various precise asymptotic estimates exist for the binomial coefficient . For example, if then^{[14]}
where d = n − 2k.
Generalizations
Generalization to multinomials
Binomial coefficients can be generalized to multinomial coefficients defined to be the number:
where
While the binomial coefficients represent the coefficients of (x+y)^{n}, the multinomial coefficients represent the coefficients of the polynomial
The case r = 2 gives binomial coefficients:
The combinatorial interpretation of multinomial coefficients is distribution of n distinguishable elements over r (distinguishable) containers, each containing exactly k_{i} elements, where i is the index of the container.
Multinomial coefficients have many properties similar to those of binomial coefficients, for example the recurrence relation:
and symmetry:
where is a permutation of (1,2,...,r).
Taylor series
Using Stirling numbers of the first kind the series expansion around any arbitrarily chosen point is
Binomial coefficient with n = ½
The definition of the binomial coefficients can be extended to the case where is real and is integer.
In particular, the following identity holds for any nonnegative integer :
This shows up when expanding into a power series using the Newton binomial series :
Identity for the product of binomial coefficients
One can express the product of binomial coefficients as a linear combination of binomial coefficients:
where the connection coefficients are multinomial coefficients. In terms of labelled combinatorial objects, the connection coefficients represent the number of ways to assign m+nk labels to a pair of labelled combinatorial objects—of weight m and n respectively—that have had their first k labels identified, or glued together to get a new labelled combinatorial object of weight m+nk. (That is, to separate the labels into three portions to apply to the glued part, the unglued part of the first object, and the unglued part of the second object.) In this regard, binomial coefficients are to exponential generating series what falling factorials are to ordinary generating series.
Partial fraction decomposition
The partial fraction decomposition of the reciprocal is given by
 and
Newton's binomial series
Newton's binomial series, named after Sir Isaac Newton, is a generalization of the binomial theorem to infinite series:
The identity can be obtained by showing that both sides satisfy the differential equation (1 + z) f'(z) = α f(z).
The radius of convergence of this series is 1. An alternative expression is
where the identity
is applied.
Multiset (rising) binomial coefficient
Binomial coefficients count subsets of prescribed size from a given set. A related combinatorial problem is to count multisets of prescribed size with elements drawn from a given set, that is, to count the number of ways to select a certain number of elements from a given set with the possibility of selecting the same element repeatedly. The resulting numbers are called multiset coefficients;^{[15]} the number of ways to "multichoose" (i.e., choose with replacement) k items from an n element set is denoted .
To avoid ambiguity and confusion with n's main denotation in this article,
let f = n = r + (k – 1) and r = f – (k – 1).
Multiset coefficients may be expressed in terms of binomial coefficients by the rule
One possible alternative characterization of this identity is as follows: We may define the falling factorial as
 ,
and the corresponding rising factorial as
 ;
so, for example,
 .
Then the binomial coefficients may be written as
 ,
while the corresponding multiset coefficient is defined by replacing the falling with the rising factorial:
 .
Generalization to negative integers
For any n,
In particular, binomial coefficients evaluated at negative integers are given by signed multiset coefficients. In the special case , this reduces to
For example, if n = 4 and k = 7, then r = 4 and f = 10:
Two real or complex valued arguments
The binomial coefficient is generalized to two real or complex valued arguments using the gamma function or beta function via
This definition inherits these following additional properties from :
moreover,
The resulting function has been littlestudied, apparently first being graphed in (Fowler 1996). Notably, many binomial identities fail: but for n positive (so negative). The behavior is quite complex, and markedly different in various octants (that is, with respect to the x and y axes and the line ), with the behavior for negative x having singularities at negative integer values and a checkerboard of positive and negative regions:
 in the octant it is a smoothly interpolated form of the usual binomial, with a ridge ("Pascal's ridge").
 in the octant and in the quadrant the function is close to zero.
 in the quadrant the function is alternatingly very large positive and negative on the parallelograms with vertices
 in the octant the behavior is again alternatingly very large positive and negative, but on a square grid.
 in the octant it is close to zero, except for near the singularities.
Generalization to qseries
The binomial coefficient has a qanalog generalization known as the Gaussian binomial coefficient.
Generalization to infinite cardinals
The definition of the binomial coefficient can be generalized to infinite cardinals by defining:
where A is some set with cardinality . One can show that the generalized binomial coefficient is welldefined, in the sense that no matter what set we choose to represent the cardinal number , will remain the same. For finite cardinals, this definition coincides with the standard definition of the binomial coefficient.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, one can show that for any infinite cardinal .
Binomial coefficient in programming languages
The notation is convenient in handwriting but inconvenient for typewriters and computer terminals. Many programming languages do not offer a standard subroutine for computing the binomial coefficient, but for example both the APL programming language and the (related) J programming language use the exclamation mark: k ! n .
Naive implementations of the factorial formula, such as the following snippet in Python:
from math import factorial
def binomialCoefficient(n, k):
return factorial(n) // (factorial(k) * factorial(n  k))
are very slow and are useless for calculating factorials of very high numbers (in languages such as C or Java they suffer from overflow errors because of this reason). A direct implementation of the multiplicative formula works well:
def binomialCoefficient(n, k):
if k < 0 or k > n:
return 0
if k == 0 or k == n:
return 1
k = min(k, n  k) # take advantage of symmetry
c = 1
for i in range(k):
c = c * (n  i) / (i + 1)
return c
(In Python, range(k) produces a list from 0 to k–1.)
Pascal's rule provides a recursive definition which can also be implemented in Python, although it is less efficient:
def binomialCoefficient(n, k):
if k < 0 or k > n:
return 0
if k > n  k: # take advantage of symmetry
k = n  k
if k == 0 or n <= 1:
return 1
return binomialCoefficient(n1, k) + binomialCoefficient(n1, k1)
The example mentioned above can be also written in functional style. The following Scheme example uses the recursive definition
Rational arithmetic can be easily avoided using integer division
The following implementation uses all these ideas
(define (binomial n k)
;; Helper function to compute C(n,k) via forward recursion
(define (binomialiter n k i prev)
(if (>= i k)
prev
(binomialiter n k (+ i 1) (/ (* ( n i) prev) (+ i 1)))))
;; Use symmetry property C(n,k)=C(n, nk)
(if (< k ( n k))
(binomialiter n k 0 1)
(binomialiter n ( n k) 0 1)))
When computing in a language with fixedlength integers, the multiplication by may overflow even when the result would fit. The overflow can be avoided by dividing first and fixing the result using the remainder:
Implementation in the C language:
#include <limits.h>
unsigned long binomial(unsigned long n, unsigned long k) {
unsigned long c = 1, i;
if (k > nk) // take advantage of symmetry
k = nk;
for (i = 1; i <= k; i++, n) {
if (c/i > UINT_MAX/n) // return 0 on overflow
return 0;
c = c / i * n + c % i * n / i; // split c * n / i into (c / i * i + c % i) * n / i
}
return c;
}
Another way to compute the binomial coefficient when using large numbers is to recognize that
where denotes the natural logarithm of the gamma function at . It is a special function that is easily computed and is standard in some programming languages such as using log_gamma in Maxima, LogGamma in Mathematica, gammaln in MATLAB and Python's SciPy module, lngamma in PARI/GP or lgamma in C, R, and Julia. Roundoff error may cause the returned value to not be an integer.
See also
 Binomial transform
 Central binomial coefficient
 Hypergeometric function
 Kummer's theorem on primepower divisors of binomial coefficients
 List of factorial and binomial topics
 Lucas' theorem
 Multiplicities of entries in Pascal's triangle
 Star of David theorem
 Sun's curious identity
 Table of Newtonian series
 Trinomial expansion
 Eulerian number
 Catalan number
 Narayana number
 Motzkin number
 Delannoy number
Notes
 ↑ Higham (1998)
 ↑ Lilavati Section 6, Chapter 4 (see Knuth (1997)).
 ↑ See (Graham, Knuth & Patashnik 1994), which also defines for . Alternative generalizations, such as to two real or complex valued arguments using the Gamma function assign nonzero values to for , but this causes most binomial coefficient identities to fail, and thus is not widely used by the majority of definitions. One such choice of nonzero values leads to the aesthetically pleasing "Pascal windmill" in Hilton, Holton and Pedersen, Mathematical reflections: in a room with many mirrors, Springer, 1997, but causes even Pascal's identity to fail (at the origin).
 ↑ Muir, Thomas (1902). "Note on Selected Combinations". Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.
 ↑ This can be seen as a discrete analog of Taylor's theorem. It is closely related to Newton's polynomial. Alternating sums of this form may be expressed as the Nörlund–Rice integral.
 ↑ Gradshteyn & Ryzhik (2014, pp. 3–4) .
 ↑ Boardman, Michael (2004), "The EggDrop Numbers", Mathematics Magazine, 77 (5): 368–372, doi:10.2307/3219201, JSTOR 3219201, MR 1573776,
it is well known that there is no closed form (that is, direct formula) for the partial sum of binomial coefficients
.  ↑ see induction developed in eq (7) p. 1389 in Aupetit, Michael (2009), "Nearly homogeneous multipartitioning with a deterministic generator", Neurocomputing, 72 (7–9): 1379–1389, doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2008.12.024, ISSN 09252312 .
 ↑ Ruiz, Sebastian (1996). "An Algebraic Identity Leading to Wilson's Theorem". The Mathematical Gazette. 80 (489): 579–582. arXiv:math/0406086. doi:10.2307/3618534. JSTOR 3618534.
 ↑ Benjamin & Quinn 2003, pp. 4−5
 ↑ Farhi, Bakir. Nontrivial lower bounds for the least common multiple of some finite sequence of integers. Journal of Number Theory 125 (2007), 393411. doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2006.10.017
 ↑ Farhi, Bakir. Nontrivial lower bounds for the least common multiple of some finite sequence of integers. Journal of Number Theory 125 (2007), 393411. doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2006.10.017
 ↑ see e.g. Ash (1990, p. 121) or Flum & Grohe (2006, p. 427).
 ↑ Spencer, Joel; Florescu, Laura (2014). Asymptopia. Student mathematical library. 71. AMS. p. 66. ISBN 9781470409043. OCLC 865574788.
 ↑ Munarini, Emanuele (2011), "Riordan matrices and sums of harmonic numbers", Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics, 5 (2): 176–200, doi:10.2298/AADM110609014M, MR 2867317 .
References
 Ash, Robert B. (1990) [1965]. Information Theory. Dover Publications, Inc. ISBN 0486665216.
 Benjamin, Arthur T.; Quinn, Jennifer J. (2003). Proofs that Really Count: The Art of Combinatorial Proof. Dolciani Mathematical Expositions. 27. Mathematical Association of America. ISBN 9780883853337. .
 Bryant, Victor (1993). Aspects of combinatorics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521419743.
 Flum, Jörg; Grohe, Martin (2006). Parameterized Complexity Theory. Springer. ISBN 9783540299523.
 Fowler, David (January 1996). "The Binomial Coefficient Function". The American Mathematical Monthly. Mathematical Association of America. 103 (1): 1–17. doi:10.2307/2975209. JSTOR 2975209.
 Goetgheluck, P. (1987). "Computing Binomial Coefficients". American Math. Monthly. 94: 360–365. doi:10.2307/2323099.
 Graham, Ronald L.; Knuth, Donald E.; Patashnik, Oren (1994). Concrete Mathematics (Second ed.). AddisonWesley. pp. 153–256. ISBN 0201558025.
 Gradshteyn, I. S.; Ryzhik, I. M. (2014). Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (8th ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 9780123849335.
 Grinshpan, A. Z. (2010), "Weighted inequalities and negative binomials", Advances in Applied Mathematics, 45 (4): 564–606, doi:10.1016/j.aam.2010.04.004
 Higham, Nicholas J. (1998). Handbook of writing for the mathematical sciences. SIAM. p. 25. ISBN 0898714206.
 Knuth, Donald E. (1997). The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 1: Fundamental Algorithms (Third ed.). AddisonWesley. pp. 52–74. ISBN 0201896834.
 Singmaster, David (1974). "Notes on binomial coefficients. III. Any integer divides almost all binomial coefficients". Journal of the London Mathematical Society. 8 (3): 555–560. doi:10.1112/jlms/s28.3.555.
 Shilov, G. E. (1977). Linear algebra. Dover Publications. ISBN 9780486635187.
External links
 Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001) [1994], "Binomial coefficients", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 9781556080104
 Andrew Granville (1997). "Arithmetic Properties of Binomial Coefficients I. Binomial coefficients modulo prime powers". CMS Conf. Proc. 20: 151–162.
This article incorporates material from the following PlanetMath articles, which are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/ShareAlike License: Binomial Coefficient, Bounds for binomial coefficients, Proof that C(n,k) is an integer, Generalized binomial coefficients.