It's not only possible, but can be done pretty reliably. There are two aspects to reading: there is deciphering the sounds that compose a word, and recognizing what that word is. These aren't the same thing. The more regular a languages' spelling is, the easier it is to teach deciphering and let the child generalize through experience. But if the spelling rules are too numerous or irregular, a child can learn to recognize words by overall shape (helped out by knowledge of what the letters are): the "look-say" method.
My sister, brother, son, daughter, and myself all learned to read very early (starting at ~2) in English by beginning with the look-say method in conjunction with learning letters. With my son and daughter, we started with wooden tiles (that we made ourselves) with a word on one side and a picture on the other. That was accessible at an age where rules like "a final e is silent but makes the previous vowel say its name (except for words like cafe and wrasse)" are too abstract to grasp.
I am not sure why there is such controversy about look-say vs. phonetics for teaching English. English spelling is ridiculous, at least for the most common words. You need to throw everything at it at once if the child is to learn early. I am not sure about the situation with French, but if you can fairly reliably teach 2-year-olds to read English, I can't imagine French is worse.
Because I do not speak French I can't recommend particular books (the Ladybird Key Words books are decent--the idea is great, but they are a little dull to motivate some children). But a strategy of reading while pointing to words, having the child recognize a few words while reading, using flash cards, teaching her the names of the letters and, when it's consistent, the sounds they represent, and then moving to syllables with consistent spelling, and so on, ought to work if the interest is there.
3That method sounds like synthetic phonics. It's a good method. – DanBeale – 2015-11-17T11:12:22.203
You can learn to read without any method, especially if you are really willing to. I learned to read at merely 3 because my mum had a laryngitis and could not speak. I was bringing her written messages to dad, but the inability to know what my sick mum needs was a strong enough drive that I started to learn to read (with dads help) by deciphering her short messages. (Can I have water? What do you want to eat? Please get me my medicine,... ) Although I vaguely remember knowing some letters before. – skymningen – 2015-11-17T12:54:19.907
11I also learned to read (Spanish) at a very early age, with much the method you describe - learned individual letters, then some basic combinations, then learned to "sound out" the words. In US, this is called phonics, although the horrible English orthography makes it much more complicated. Keep at it, it will work, and definitely keep reading to her while pointing at the words. Celebrate and encourage her desire to read. – AgapwIesu – 2015-11-17T15:08:51.680
6What do you mean, is it possible, young children are learning to read all over the world. – Jodrell – 2015-11-17T15:33:36.580
3@Jodrell The question mentions a specific age, and also asks for information on how. – Erica – 2015-11-17T15:46:48.240
Yes, it is possible, I learned reading at about that age, and only a little older I started with my children. Just make sure that this is a fun thing to them, and that you never insist on anything. Let them come to you, a lot of times they will lose interest and after a while gain it again because they realize reading is useful, and then lose interest again etc. – PlasmaHH – 2015-11-17T15:48:13.790
Just for one data point: I don’t know what method they used, but my parents tell me I was reading (certainly words, and I think sentences) before I was 3. And I turned out a very enthusiastic reader, through childhood and since… – PLL – 2015-11-17T15:48:27.323
Same here. My mom tells me I was starting to read at 2.5, so she should definitely be developed enough to be capable. – Mason Wheeler – 2015-11-17T16:05:00.650
My son learned to read at about that age. Two things that really got him going were a computerised alphabet toy that taught him the letter sounds, and the Leapfrog "Letter Factory" video (http://www.leapfrog.com/en-us/app-center/p/letter-factory-video/_/A-prod53010-97914). I don't know if there is anything equivalent in French though.
– Paul Johnson – 2015-11-17T17:40:00.0302I'm not sure if I'm allowed to suggest reading material, but I think Doctor Seuss books might be good to start reading with. Not sure though. – Nzall – 2015-11-17T18:27:33.107
I found this article interesting, there are several advices you can try. http://www.wikihow.com/Teach-Your-Child-to-Read
– Howl Jenkins – 2015-11-17T20:50:27.483I encourage everyone to continue the (interesting, detailed) discussion of different reading instruction in different languages to a topical Parenting Chat room :) It's getting a little on the long side.
– Erica – 2015-11-19T16:31:38.117I learned with the "whole world" method, common before "phonics" became popular. My opinion is that "whole world" is probably better for young children since they have amazing memories. "Phonics" is more algorithmic and harder to teach to a child who has only just acquired language. Also "phonics" is going to be painful and disappointing to a child trying to read English; though, it's probably great for regular, Romance languages. And in the long run, nobody reads phonetically. – Noah Spurrier – 2015-11-19T22:59:37.193
"but I'm not sure she could understand that." you are giving little credit to your daughter. As someone that essentially self-taught how to read, I can see that she's following the same route I did. Except, perhaps, that she doesn't shout what she can read of each signboard she finds while traveling. – Braiam – 2015-11-20T15:52:16.923
Not worth making an entire answer for...but I'd point out that it is definitely possible. Both me and my sister were reading at age 2. I know of other examples of this as well. – Jimbo Jonny – 2015-11-20T18:02:53.207
@NoahSpurrier There are people who read "with sound in their head" (and those who do not: never be surprised by how differently people think!). When they run into a new word they have never heard, they read phonetically, as there isn't really another choice. Anyone, when speaking a word they have never heard, will read it phonetically (often based on bigger-than-single-letter patterns, admittedly). – Yakk – 2015-11-20T19:04:56.603
1Read fun books together, you read a line, stop before a key word, have her read or guess it, eventually she memorizes and associates the letters with the word. You can start as early as 1, no problem. For extra fun, read a sentence, "mis-read" one word, e.g. "rabbit" instead of "chicken", she'll notice something wrong and correct you. Keep your finger on the words you're reading, read very clearly, read the same books repeatedly and that's it. I recommend "Tchoupi" and "Les p'tites poules" in français. :-) – PatrickT – 2015-11-21T11:52:31.080