should + gerund?

2

What is the best to say

I sent a cd to a man and I emailed him three days after sending the cd "You should be getting it soon" Is it correct or shall I say "you should get it soon". What is the difference

user5577

Posted 2016-02-05T17:29:33.520

Reputation: 5 564

3There is no gerund after "should". – rogermue – 2016-02-06T03:17:02.880

Answers

3

Both

You should be getting it soon.

and

You should get it soon.

are grammatically correct. They are essentially the same and both sound perfectly normal, at least to me (native AE speaker). Any difference between them would be pedantic at most.

Kevin

Posted 2016-02-05T17:29:33.520

Reputation: 5 009

Perhaps the "should be getting" form conveys a bit more tentative connotation, vagueness about timeframe, etc., while "should get" seems a bit more direct and definite. – Monty Harder – 2016-02-05T21:29:42.177

2

Both are correct. Both mean the same thing in this context. In other contexts there might be a small difference in meaning. Using BE + GERUND seems to be gaining in popularity. A McDonald's slogan is "I'm loving it" instead of "I love it".

pogidaga

Posted 2016-02-05T17:29:33.520

Reputation: 111

An example where the meaning is a little different: You should be traveling to Russia right now. means "You're supposed to be on your way to Russia." whereas You should travel to Russia right now. means "You should leave for Russia immediately." – Era – 2016-02-05T20:22:45.580