If you're talking about the surface of a colony of fungus, and it is not flat, there are many different terms you could use based on the level of "not-flat-ness" (patent pending):
- Rough - Think like the texture of sandpaper or jeans
- Ribbed - Like corduroy pants
- Varied - Like rolling hills. Areas are flat, and others sloped
- Sloped - Like a round hill, or the top of a mushroom
- Cracked - Has cracks in it
- Creviced - Like cracked, but deeper
- Undulating - Marked by steep rolling hills
- Pockmarked - Filled with small holes, like a sponge
- Fissured - Similar to cracked, but stronger
- Craggy - Like the rocky face of a cliff
- Cleft - Split in the middle, like a cleft chin
- Mountainous - Mountains
- Severe - Steep
- Pitted - Like pockmarked, but deeper holes
- Not flat - Exactly what it says, something's not flat.
They all have subtle meanings, implying different levels of "not-flat-ness."
Also, as others have pointed out, you would not usually say that something is both flat AND rugged. In English, rugged is typically used to amplify the adjective describing how unflat something is. So mountains are rugged, but a flat plains land probably wouldn't necessarily be, unless you're trying to imply that at first glance the prairie looked flat and easy to cross but it turned out not to be because it was full of danger.
7flat and rugged could be considered antonyms, so I'm having trouble understanding your first example. But a colony of fungi that isn't "flat" might be considered "bumpy." – J.R. – 2014-12-09T08:54:14.410
1Perhaps this question would be better suited to biology SE since it is about colony morphology. Flat is used to describe the elevation of a colony. A colony could also be described as raised, umbonate or a number of other possibilities. Since there is more that one possible description, there really is no opposite of flat in this context. It would be best to describe the colony by what it is rather than what it is not. – canadianer – 2014-12-09T09:33:33.800
For this specific usage it might be refering to "hairy" or "fuzzy" - but I agree with @can this may be better at biology.se – Raystafarian – 2014-12-09T09:39:45.970
3Also, "not flat" can work. Sometimes "not <adjective>" is the best way to express something. I might say, "She's not rich," but that doesn't mean she's poor – it just means she isn't rich. – J.R. – 2014-12-09T10:30:30.470
See also: http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/project_ideas/MicroBio_Interpreting_Plates.shtml
– Damkerng T. – 2014-12-09T14:57:24.1101
@canadianer: Right on. I have discovered it: http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~bioslabs/bios318/colony.htm
– student – 2014-12-09T15:06:10.407@student - Nice! You found your answer. SE allows you to answer your own question; I'd urge you to do so, now that you've got some words that fit your context. – J.R. – 2014-12-10T11:12:57.347