9
7
As fas as I know, "have to" is the commoner version of the two,
but I'm finding more and more that "having to" is also used instead of "have to".
She has to / is having to look after herself now.
Are both freely interchangeable without any difference in meaning?
If any,I want to know what is the difference between the two and when you use "having to" more preferably than the other.
Proper contexts with good examples to be given will be very helpful to me.
1I am not an expert but to me it seems like "is having to" defines an ongoing situation where "has to" defines only an idea. The speaker not sure about if it's going to happen that way while using "has to" but when uses "is having to" it sounds more like obvious and sure. – Berker Yüceer – 2014-08-06T10:45:02.350
1I'm sure OP's I'm finding more and more that "having to" is also used is simply a "recency illusion". Either that, or OP interacts with many speakers of Indian English (whose "overuse" of continuous verb forms is a stereotypical identifying characteristic). – FumbleFingers Reinstate Monica – 2014-08-06T13:26:58.290