If you had told me, I would have used the other route.
If you had told me, I could have used the other route.
Would here denotes a certain consequence of the unreal condition: no question about it, I would have used the other route.
Could denotes a possible consequence of the unreal condition: if you had told me, I might still have taken this route but I would have had the choice of taking the other route.
If you had toldPast Irrealis me, I wouldPresent Irrealis use the other route.
If you tellPresent Realis me, I wouldPresent Irrealis use the other route.
These are not quite impossible, but the circumstances under which either would be acceptable are very unlikely to arise. Ordinarily these forms would be understood as having the tense/mode significances I have noted in superscript, and in most cases the two verbs, the one in the IF clause and the one in the THEN clause, should have the same tense and mode.†
† This is not always the case in conditional clauses involving logical inference; but I do not think either of these sentences can be read as inferential.
Welcome to ELU! Please make an effort to observe ordinary rules of punctuation and capitalization. And you can make your question easier for people to read and answer by employing the available formatting options. See THIS.
– StoneyB on hiatus – 2014-05-07T15:24:06.033Go back in time where these sentences are turned into present tense. This may give you some hint: *If you tell me, I will use the other route.* and *If you tell me, I can use the other route.* – Maulik V – 2014-05-07T15:26:48.663