6
I need to know whether it is possible to substitute the following bold part with the adveb "nakedly" in a manner that it doesn't change the meaning and doesn't make it ambiguous:
- She went to street with nothing on in broad daylight and people were shocked looking at her!
Is it natural to say:
- She went to street nakedly in broad daylight and people were shocked looking at her!
I've rearely faced people use the word "nakedly" and this is why I doubt if somehow to a native speaker's ears it sounds a bit weird!
1I've slightly changed your example to make it better. – James K – 2019-04-14T09:19:05.260
thank you very much, I doubted if "naked" which is an adjective can work as an adverb too in this sense! – A-friend – 2019-04-14T09:51:38.977
6@JamesK I think "naked" in your examples is not really an adverb. In one, it is a predicate adjective used with a copular verb other than "be". We omit the "-ly" in "go naked" for the same reason as in "run wild", "freeze solid", or "fall silent". In the other example, I would take "naked" as an appositive adjective modifying "she" (but we can also say "lie naked" as a predicate). – nanoman – 2019-04-14T11:09:44.003
2I agree with nanoman, and in my experience this is one of the more difficult aspects of English for foreign learners, especially because native speakers usually cannot explain or analyse why it is correct one way and not another, they just "know it when they see it". – Robert Furber – 2019-04-14T12:19:12.790
I think @nanoman's analysis is good, and shall edit. – James K – 2019-04-14T14:55:02.750
1+1 for "adverbially". – Nat – 2019-04-15T00:19:17.320